SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 número1Parallel planning mechanisms as a "recipe for disaster" índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ)

versión On-line ISSN 1727-3781

Resumen

MONYAMANE, L  y  BAPELA, MP. Gongqose v Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries – A Tale of Customary Rituals and Practices in Marine Protected Areas. PER [online]. 2019, vol.22, n.1, pp.1-17. ISSN 1727-3781.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a5937.

The correct application of customary law post constitutionalism continues to be the subject of much judicial and academic deliberation. This is especially true where the existence and/or scope of customary rights and cultural practices are not well defined in a specific case. Gongqose v Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 2018 5 SA 104 (SCA) presents a perfect example of the dissonance between the recognition of customary law by the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 and the regulation of rights and cultural practices emanating from customary law. The case grapples with the meeting point of customary rights and customs and the need to preserve the environment. This intersection is considered in view of earth jurisprudence as an emerging legal thought topic in environmental law. On the whole, the decision of the SCA demonstrates encouraging signs of an appreciation of customary law as deserving of an equal place on the legal podium.

Palabras clave : Marine Protected Areas; cultural practices; customary law; Gongqose.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons