SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 issue1Parallel planning mechanisms as a "recipe for disaster" author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ)

On-line version ISSN 1727-3781

Abstract

NAPOLEON, V. Did I Break It? Recording Indigenous (Customary) Law. PER [online]. 2019, vol.22, n.1, pp.1-35. ISSN 1727-3781.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a7588.

In this paper, I explore several issues emerging in the discourse about the recording of indigenous law by drawing on several examples of my research and work with indigenous law in Canada. This is an important inquiry because there are limiting and disturbing fundamentalist premises underlying the debate regarding the recording of indigenous law. To take up these issues, I analyse and articulate the law and legal processes from two indigenous oral histories. The question under consideration is whether by this recording and analysis, I have somehow damaged Gitxsan law. In other words, did I break it?

Keywords : Indigenous; law; legal traditions; fundamentalism; human rights; feminism: gender.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License