Abstract

HAMMAN, A; ALBERTUS, C  and  NORTJE, W. Deciphering Dangerousness: A Critical Analysis of Section 286A and B of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977. PER [online]. 2019, vol.22, n.1, pp.1-25. ISSN 1727-3781.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a5950.

The violent nature of some crimes and the high crime rate in South Africa reflect the fact that some offenders constitute a real threat to the security of communities. It is understandable, therefore, that the state seeks to protect its citizens through preventive measures. Although South Africa has certain legal provisions on its statutory books, it seems that the declaration of persons as dangerous criminals is under-utilised. South African legislation dealing with the declaration of dangerous criminals can be improved by borrowing some traits of the Canadian legislation. Such features include the restriction of courts' discretion and the provision of concrete and more detailed guidelines on the nature of the offences for which the provision can be applied. The courts could also take into account the type of criminal history of the offender which would merit the declaration of a dangerous criminal. It is also important that the extent of the violence in an offence should be thoroughly defined in court. Courts need to balance their wide discretion on the matter with the provisions in the Act in order to protect the community against dangerous criminals.

Keywords : Sentencing; dangerous criminal; indeterminate sentence; preventative detention; discretion; psychiatric enquiry; community safety; under-utilised.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )