SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 número1Parallel planning mechanisms as a "recipe for disaster" índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ)

versión On-line ISSN 1727-3781

Resumen

ROBINSON, Robbie. The Legal Nature of the Embryo: Legal Subject or Legal Object?. PER [online]. 2018, vol.21, n.1, pp.1-31. ISSN 1727-3781.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a2914.

This contribution addresses the question regarding the legal nature of a cryopreserved embryo. Such preservation is a relatively modern development in the medical field. Neither Tennessee (USA) law nor European law provides an acceptable explanation regarding its legal nature. It is argued herein that this is mainly due to the fact that rather unscientific language is applied. It is suggested that the using of concise legal terminology may contribute to a better understanding. The terms legal subject and object and legal subjectivity are well-known and have definite legal content. By drawing an analogy between the legal status of an infant and such embryos, the conclusion is reached that embryos are not legal subjects sui iuris but indeed share the legal subjectivity of their parents.

Palabras clave : Embryo; legal subjectivity; legal subject; legal object; cryopreserved ova; person; property; legal status; foetus.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons