SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 issue1Parallel planning mechanisms as a "recipe for disaster" author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ)

On-line version ISSN 1727-3781

Abstract

ROBINSON, Robbie. The Legal Nature of the Embryo: Legal Subject or Legal Object?. PER [online]. 2018, vol.21, n.1, pp.1-31. ISSN 1727-3781.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a2914.

This contribution addresses the question regarding the legal nature of a cryopreserved embryo. Such preservation is a relatively modern development in the medical field. Neither Tennessee (USA) law nor European law provides an acceptable explanation regarding its legal nature. It is argued herein that this is mainly due to the fact that rather unscientific language is applied. It is suggested that the using of concise legal terminology may contribute to a better understanding. The terms legal subject and object and legal subjectivity are well-known and have definite legal content. By drawing an analogy between the legal status of an infant and such embryos, the conclusion is reached that embryos are not legal subjects sui iuris but indeed share the legal subjectivity of their parents.

Keywords : Embryo; legal subjectivity; legal subject; legal object; cryopreserved ova; person; property; legal status; foetus.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License