SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.18 issue5When certainty and legality collide: the efficacy of interdictory relief for the cessation of building works pending review proceedings author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ)

On-line version ISSN 1727-3781


VORSTER, A  and  COETZEE, JP. Essentials of a valid trust revisited in the light of Khabola v Ralithabo [2011] ZAFSHC 62. PER [online]. 2015, vol.18, n.5, pp.1797-1810. ISSN 1727-3781.

The trust is universally recognised and used. It is generally accepted that trust deeds meet the basic requirements. However, it is not always that simple and the courts are repeatedly forced to take deeds of trust under scrutiny. In such cases the court has to rule on the validity of the trust, the locus standi of the parties, trust administration, the intent of the parties or what the implications of an invalid trust are for previous and current agreements. Similar problems arose in Khabola v Ralithabo. The authors discuss this verdict and show that there is still much uncertainty on how certain trust aspects have to be dealt with, and emphasise the importance of testing every trust deed according to the essential requirements of a valid trust.

Keywords : trust; trust deed; valid trust; basic requirements.

        · text in Afrikaans     · Afrikaans ( pdf )


Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License