SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 número5Spatial practices in Lowliebenhof: the case of Maphango v Aengus Lifestyle Properties (Pty) LtdLimiting organisational rights of minority unions: POPCRU v Ledwaba 2013 11 BLLR 1137 (LC) índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


PER: Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad

versão On-line ISSN 1727-3781

Resumo

SHARROCK, R. Rectification and party misdescription: to what extent is rectification competent or useful?. PER [online]. 2014, vol.17, n.5, pp.2195-2207. ISSN 1727-3781.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v17i5.09.

The decision in Osborne v West Dunes Properties 176 2013 6 SA 105 (WCC) raises some interesting issues regarding the competence or usefulness of rectifying an incorrect party description in a contract required by law to be in writing and signed. This case note explains and critically analyses the court's reasoning on these issues and suggests that courts should bear in mind certain important principles when dealing with a problem of this nature.

Palavras-chave : Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981; principle of certainty; formal agreement; locus standi; rectification.

        · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons