SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 número3The impact of HIV/AIDS regarding informal social security: issues and perspectives from a South African contextThe South AFrican constitutional court and the rule of law: the Masethla judgment, a cause for concern? índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ)

versión On-line ISSN 1727-3781

Resumen

MUPANGAVANHU, Y. Exemption clauses and the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008: An assessment of Naidoo v Birchwood Hotel 2012 6 SA 170 (GSJ). PER [online]. 2014, vol.17, n.3, pp.01-30. ISSN 1727-3781.

Exemption clauses are a rule rather than an exception particularly in standard-form contracts. Consumers are usually forced to accept such terms on a "take-it-or-leave-it" basis. This state of affairs shows that freedom of contract is theoretical and could lead to injustices. In Naidoo v Birchwood Hotel 2012 6 SA 170 (GSJ) the Court refused to uphold the exemption clauses based on the fact that it would have been unfair and unjust to the plaintiff who had sustained serious bodily injuries during his stay at the hotel. The article discusses this court decision in the light of the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) against the background of the previous jurisprudence regarding exemption clauses, including the position of exemption clauses in a new constitutional dispensation.

Palabras clave : Exemption clauses; consumer protection; fairness and reasonableness; public policy; constitutional values.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons