SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 issue4Traditional knowledge and patent protection: conflicting views on international patent standardsSome tax implications of traditional knowledge under conventional intellectual property author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Bookmark

    PER: Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad

    On-line version ISSN 1727-3781

    Abstract

    GEYER, S. Towards a clearer definition and understanding of "indigenous community" for the purposes of the intellectual property laws amendment bill, 2010: an exploration of the concepts "indigenous" and "traditional". PER [online]. 2010, vol.13, n.4, pp. 127-143. ISSN 1727-3781.

    Although "indigenous" and "traditional" are key concepts in the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill of 2010, they are not defined therein. The Bill does, however, provide a definition of "indigenous community" that is very clear as to where one should look for indigenous communities for the purposes of this Bill, and that there is likely to be a plurality of such communities, but is very vague as to which groups exactly will qualify as being indigenous. It is uncertain whether or not the current vague wording of the definition would be strong enough to widen the much narrower understanding of indigenousness prevailing in other South African legislation, the legislation of selected other jurisdictions, and the United Nations. Recommendations are made as to how the definition of an "indigenous community" may be rephrased to address these uncertainties more clearly.

    Keywords : Indigenous community; intellectual property; indigenous; traditional.

            · text in English     · pdf in English