PER: Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad
Print version ISSN 1727-3781
HUMBY, T. Reflections on the biowatch dispute: reviewing the fundamental rules on cost in the light of the needs of constitutional and/or public interest litigation. PER [online]. 2009, vol.12, n.1, pp. 0-0. ISSN 1727-3781.
Using as a case study the recent decision on costs in the Biowatch matter, this article critically examines the traditional fundamental rules on costs in the light of the needs of constitutional and a fortiori public interest litigation. The fundamental rules on costs are taken to include the two traditional principles (that costs are a matter of judicial discretion and that to a successful party should be awarded his costs), the requirement that the discretion be exercised judicially, the test for interference in costs orders in a court of appeal, and the characterisation of costs orders as requiring the exercise of only a narrow discretion on appeal. In the light of the decisions in the Biowatch matter it is argued that the current rules do not meet the new needs of constitutional and/or public interest litigation as regards access to justice, equal protection and benefit of the law, proportionality, and the accountability of the judiciary. Suggestions are made for possible reform.