SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.43 número2Beyond literal understanding: "womb theft" as metonym - an interpretation of the language used to describe caesarean kidnappings*A critical analysis of South Africa's system of government: from a disjunctive system to a synergistic system of government índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Obiter

versión On-line ISSN 2709-555X
versión impresa ISSN 1682-5853

Resumen

SUBRAMANIEN, Darren. "Legal standing" and "the demand" in Section 165 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008: a comparative discussion. Obiter [online]. 2022, vol.43, n.2, pp.46-71. ISSN 2709-555X.

Section 165 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 provides that applicants with locus standi who are aware of a wrong perpetrated against the company and who wish to pursue a derivative action against the company must have served a demand on the company requiring it to commence or continue legal proceedings to protect its own legal interests. Thereafter, the company must have filed a notice indicating that the company refuses to comply with the demand, or alternatively, the company must have failed to comply at all or failed to comply properly with its obligations relating to the investigation of the demand and its response to the demand. This article explores the concepts of legal standing and the demand that must be served on the company requiring it to commence or continue legal proceedings to protect its own legal interests as contemplated in section 165(2) of the 2008 Act, with the aim of identifying the commendable aspects of these concepts as well as the possible shortfalls.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons