SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.43 número1Teaching human rights in commonwealth university law schools: approaches and challenges, with passing references to some south african experiencesPutting the relationship between states and the icc into perspective: the viability of national courts in driving complementarity in Africa índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Obiter

versión On-line ISSN 2709-555X
versión impresa ISSN 1682-5853

Resumen

SINGH, Annie  y  TEMBO, Simbarashe. Constitutionalism and public health emergencies: COVID-19 regulations in South Africa and the constitutional and human rights slippery slope. Obiter [online]. 2022, vol.43, n.1, pp.152-166. ISSN 2709-555X.

This article provides a theoretical and factual-legal analysis of South Africa's response to the COVID-19. The state of disaster and its related COVID-19 regulations are interrogated from a constitutional and human rights perspective. It is conceded that public health emergencies call for a limitation of certain rights to control or curb the spread of the pandemic. However, the measures adopted by the South African government were in some respects disproportional and violated the constitutional and human rights principles. This article carefully examines the South African approach in instances where the constitutional and human rights of its people were brought into contention. For purposes of clarity, the focus is on documented accounts of the violations of fundamental human rights during the declaration and the operation of Lockdown Regulations in terms of the Disaster Management Act 2002.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons