SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.42 issue3 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Obiter

On-line version ISSN 2709-555X
Print version ISSN 1682-5853

Abstract

NADVI, SS  and  OSMAN-HYDER, M. A comparative study of Islamic and South African law on living and cadaveric organ donations: consensus and divergence. Obiter [online]. 2021, vol.42, n.3, pp.608-624. ISSN 2709-555X.

Religion plays a pivotal role in people's attitude to organ donation. Generally, practising Muslims (adherents of the Islamic faith) are unlikely to consent to organ donation because they believe it is not in keeping with the tenets of Islamic law (Sharfah). Although there is a wealth of information on organ donation with reference to both South African and Islamic law, there has not been a study comparing the two sets of laws. The purpose of this article is to develop the literature on living and cadaveric organ donation by drawing a comparison between Islamic law and South African law on this issue. Apart from a few minor differences inherent in each set of laws, there is a startling consensus in South African law and SunnT (mainstream) Islamic law1 on the issue of organ donation.2 This research is also significant in that it provides legal and medical professionals, academics and practitioners with an informed position from which to advise clients and/or patients. This may in turn raise awareness among clients and/or patients, which could result in a desirable increase in organ donation rates among Muslims in South Africa. This article makes a number of recommendations in this regard.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License