SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.22 número3DEFCON 5: The Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital orthopaedic department's COVID-19 proactive action planOutcomes of primary fusion in high-energy Lisfranc injuries at a tertiary state hospital índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google


SA Orthopaedic Journal

versão On-line ISSN 2309-8309
versão impressa ISSN 1681-150X


MZAMO, Solomzi et al. The use of a mobile software application to improve the management of open tibia fractures in a resource-constrained environment. SA orthop. j. [online]. 2023, vol.22, n.3, pp.140-145. ISSN 2309-8309.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the initial management and the outcomes of patients with open tibia fractures referred to a tertiary orthopaedic unit using a mobile software application (app), Vula Medical Referral (VULA), with those referred by handwritten referral letters (HWRL). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on data collected from the clinical records of patients diagnosed with open tibia fractures and referred to a tertiary level orthopaedic trauma unit over two years. The referrals originated from a community health centre and a district-level hospital via electronic means (VULA) or physical referral letters (HWRL). The primary outcomes of interest included the initial patient management, the referral delay and definitive fracture management. Comparative complication rates within one year were an additional outcome of interest. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-two cases were analysed, 103 (64%) in the VULA group and 59 (36%) in the HWRL group. The two groups displayed no significant differences in demographics or injury characteristics. There was a difference in the time from referral to the time of assessment at the tertiary centre (p = 0.028), with the VULA group having a shorter time (mean of 5 hours vs 6 hours). Differences were noted between the referral groups regarding referral documentation content, initial management strategies and complication rates. There were three (2%) patients with non-union and 17 (11%) with infection. The VULA group had comparatively fewer complications, 6% (6 of 103) compared to 24% (14 of 59) in the HWRL group. CONCLUSION: This study found that using the VULA app resulted in better transfer of information and documentation of initial management of open fractures by the referring institution. Time from referral to being assessed by orthopaedics was also marginally better. While our findings suggest that there may be a lower complication rate with the use of the mobile application, further research is required to confirm this. Level of evidence: Level 4

Palavras-chave : open fracture; tibia; referral method; mobile application; software; technology.

        · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )


Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons