SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.18 issue2Posterior based circumferential spinal cord decompression in paediatric patients with the vertebral column resection (VCR) technique spares the anterior approach in severe kyphosisEpidemiology and injury severity of 294 extremity gunshot wounds in ten months: a report from the Cape Town trauma registry author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


SA Orthopaedic Journal

On-line version ISSN 2309-8309
Print version ISSN 1681-150X

Abstract

WORKMAN, ΜI  and  KRUGER, N. A survey of the use of traction for the reduction of cervical dislocations. SA orthop. j. [online]. 2019, vol.18, n.2, pp.25-30. ISSN 2309-8309.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2019/v18n2a2.

BACKGROUND: Literature supports early decompression of low energy cervical spine dislocations. Closed reduction can safely and rapidly achieve this; however, its use and acceptance among specialists is poorly described. This study aimed to assess the training, experience and decision-making of trainees and surgeons who manage cervical spine dislocations with the goal of reinforcing educational programmes as necessary. The objective was to assess the need to implement further training for trainees and specialists involved in the management of cervical spine dislocations METHODS: Orthopaedic and neurosurgery registrars and specialists in South Africa were emailed a questionnaire consisting of 13 questions related to their training, experience and management of cervical dislocations RESULTS: Seventy-nine per cent (n=62) of surgeons were taught closed reduction during specialist training. Ninety-two per cent (n=12) of neurosurgeons covered spine trauma compared to 66% (n=42) of orthopaedic surgeons. Of surgeons covering trauma, 21% (n=16) would refer the patient on, accepting a 2-hour delay in treatment. Forty-two per cent (n=5) of neurosurgeons vs <2% (n=1) of orthopaedic surgeons preferred MRI before closed reduction. Fifty-six per cent (n=40) of surgeons thought that the risk of worsening neurology during traction was up to 25%. Sixty-nine per cent (n=54) of surgeons felt emergency room (ER) doctors could safely perform closed cervical reduction with training. Fifty-one per cent of surgeons do not think cervical reduction is routinely possible in under 4 hours CONCLUSION: The public and specialists have misconceptions around cervical traction which may affect best clinical practice and optimum management. Cervical traction does not require prior MRI and carries a very low risk of worsening a patient's condition. Closed cervical traction reduction is the most rapid, safe mechanism to reduce cervical dislocations and requires specific education of undergraduates, emergency doctors, and specialists to increase awareness of the reduction process Level of evidence: Level 4

Keywords : cervical spine dislocation; closed reduction of cervical spine dislocation; unifacet dislocation; bifacet dislocation.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License