SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 issue1Western "Supremacy" and the "Renaissance" Issue: Decolonising as Imitative ReactionTo Save Lives: The Ethical Precedent set by South Africa's Leadership during Lockdown author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Phronimon

On-line version ISSN 2413-3086
Print version ISSN 1561-4018

Abstract

LOTTER, Casper. A Cross-cultural Feminist Analysis of Dominant Discourse on Modern Chinese Marriages: Is the personal still political?. Phronimon [online]. 2022, vol.23, n.1, pp.1-26. ISSN 2413-3086.  http://dx.doi.org/10.25159/2413-3086/10037.

In view of China's deepening engagement in Africa, I consider progress with regard to gender roles as a valuable measure by which to comparatively gauge the emancipatory feminist potential of Chinese and South African marriage practices. By way of cross-cultural feminist analysis, I thereby attempt to evaluate the institutionalised master discourse on gender dynamics within marriage in the People' s Republic of China (PRC). In particular, this ideological critique will employ second-wave feminism's "personal as political" theoretical lens, as well as both Jacques Lacan's theory of discourse and Pierre Bourdieu's distinction between orthodox and heterodox discourses. Additionally, the dominant discourse on marriage in the post-Maoist PRC is argued to be both oppressive (same-sex marriage remains illegal) and progressive (divorce by agreement is an administrative act). If therefore, the twenty-first century is indeed to be a time of Chinese global dominance, such investigations are pertinent to questions of global gender equality, as well as to cross-cultural social justice discourse in general.

Keywords : cross-cultural feminist analysis; marriage practices; the personal as political; dominant gender discourse(s); People's Republic of China (PRC); South Africa.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License