SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.15 issue1Nietzsche's Übermensch: A glance behind the mask of hardnessFuture directiveness within the South African domestic workers' work-life cycle: Considering exit strategies author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology

On-line version ISSN 2079-7222

Abstract

OWEN, Ian Rory. In lieu of a review of the latest English translation of Ideas I: A reading of Husserl's original intent and its relevance for empirical qualitative psychology. Indo-Pac. j. phenomenol. (Online) [online]. 2015, vol.15, n.1, pp. 1-13. ISSN 2079-7222.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20797222.2015.1049899.

Husserl 's phenomenology provides theory for empirical science and other practices in the form of transcendental philosophy after Kant. This phenomenology is a reflection on mental objects in relation to mental processes, some of which are shared in culture: a theoretical framework that grounds and co-ordinates theory-production for empirical practice. The importance of the original work of Edmund Husserl for contemporary empirical psychology is that it provides the conceptual justification for the methods employed and the interpretative stances taken. Informed theoretically by Husserl's phenomenology, empirical psychology is thus a discipline grounded and co-ordinated by essences. Essences are about the being of consciousness connected with other consciousness and mental senses, expressed as various forms of intentionality in connection with sense and meaning. The aim of this paper is to clarify some key features of Ideas I rather than to comment on the quality of the translation by Dahlstrom (2014) or the closeness of the readings of leading phenomenological psychologists to the original.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License