SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.12 número2Shy and ticklish truths as species of scientific and artistic perception índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology

versão On-line ISSN 2079-7222

Resumo

WALSH, Russell. On evidence and argument in phenomenological research. Indo-Pac. j. phenomenol. (Online) [online]. 2012, vol.12, n.2, pp. 1-7. ISSN 2079-7222.  http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/ipjp.2012.12.1.3.1111.

Set against a background of calls for evidence-based practice, this paper explores the role of evidence and argument in phenomenological research. Drawing on Smith's (1998) analysis of original argument, the author considers how evidence can be discerned, understood, and communicated, and the resulting kinds and contexts of knowledge that may be constituted in the practice of phenomenological research. Linking Churchill's (2012) discussion of researcher perspectivity with Smith's analysis of original argument, contrasts are drawn between rhetorical, demonstrative, and dialectical approaches to argument, with proposed parallels to first-person, second-person, and third-person perspectives explored. Implications for argument-based phenomenological research are discussed.

        · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License