SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 issue2Imagen y represión de la prostitución en época visigodaLatino e altre lingue nel tardo antico: Qualche considerazione sulle "piae causae" author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Fundamina

On-line version ISSN 2411-7870
Print version ISSN 1021-545X

Abstract

PENNITZ, Martin. Fundamina (Pretoria) [online]. 2014, vol.20, n.2, pp.667-676. ISSN 2411-7870.

In Afr. D. 13.6.21.1 the expression vasa utenda periculo communi dedi means that the parties to commodatum have added a pact to the contract. The borrowers are then not only liable for dolus, culpa and custodia (safe-keeping), but bear the risk of vis maior too. Because of this contractual provision, African assumes that the legal situation of the borrowers is similar to that of co-owners of a res communis. This is why the borrowers are liable pro parte, when the borrowed objects have been stolen by the lender's slave. On the other hand (and according to Cels.-Ulp. D. 9.2.27.2), each of the borrowers is allowed to sue the dominus by an actio furti noxalis. If the lender decides to escape his liability by surrendering the offender, the slave has to be shared among the socii; for this reason the other borrowers will probably be entitled to an actio communi dividundo or a similar actio in factum against the plaintiff.

        · text in German     · German ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License