SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.20 issue2L'età per fidanzarsi nei libri differentiarum di ModestinoUne repetitio de Pierre de Belleperche sur la "loi" Quod Nerva [D. 16,3,32] author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google



On-line version ISSN 2411-7870
Print version ISSN 1021-545X


LAQUERRIERE-LACROIX, Aude. La portee normative des rescripta ad consultationem emissa sous Constantin. Fundamina (Pretoria) [online]. 2014, vol.20, n.2, pp.527-535. ISSN 2411-7870.

This study aims to revisit the Constantinian texts concerning rescripts ad consultationem emissa. Do these rescripts have the value of precedents, applicable by analogy to similar cases, as they did during the classical period? Does the prince's reply merely constitute an advisory opinion that will leave the judge in control of the case, or does it constitute the final judgment? In June 318 Constantine seems to have taken a definite decision - the judge loses control over the case as soon as he refers it to the prince; the prince, supreme authority and sole interpreter of the law, is then the only one to pass final judgment.

        · text in French     · French ( pdf )


Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License