SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número1"Soo 's Lands Ordonnantie vergeeffs niet is gemaeckt": Rooms-Fries recht in een zaak over dierschade bij het Hof van FrieslandPerceptions of Roman justice índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Fundamina

versión On-line ISSN 2411-7870

Resumen

DONDORP, J.H.. Quanti ea res erit: wat vertellen we onze studenten?. Fundamina (Pretoria) [online]. 2014, vol.20, n.1, pp. 206-215. ISSN 2411-7870.

To what extent do Dutch textbooks on Roman law reflect the controversy that has continued for almost a century over the interpretation of caput 3 of the lex Aquilia? In 1945, Van Oven discussed the relevant literature of his day, but since then Kaser's view has been favoured, even though, in 1976, Feenstra inclined towards Daube's alternative interpretation of quanti ea res erit and this led to the ongoing debate. The interpretation of caput 3 is clearly more controversial than students are usually led to believe.

        · texto en Holandés     · Holandés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License