SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 issue1"Soo 's Lands Ordonnantie vergeeffs niet is gemaeckt": Rooms-Fries recht in een zaak over dierschade bij het Hof van FrieslandPerceptions of Roman justice author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Fundamina

On-line version ISSN 2411-7870

Abstract

DONDORP, J.H.. Quanti ea res erit: wat vertellen we onze studenten?. Fundamina (Pretoria) [online]. 2014, vol.20, n.1, pp. 206-215. ISSN 2411-7870.

To what extent do Dutch textbooks on Roman law reflect the controversy that has continued for almost a century over the interpretation of caput 3 of the lex Aquilia? In 1945, Van Oven discussed the relevant literature of his day, but since then Kaser's view has been favoured, even though, in 1976, Feenstra inclined towards Daube's alternative interpretation of quanti ea res erit and this led to the ongoing debate. The interpretation of caput 3 is clearly more controversial than students are usually led to believe.

        · text in Dutch     · Dutch ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License