SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.19 número1Abuse of state power: the mandatory death penalty for political crimes in Southern Rhodesia, 1963 - 1970A conspectus of South African legal periodicals: past to present índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google



versión On-line ISSN 2411-7870
versión impresa ISSN 1021-545X


OTTO, JM. Vetustas, onheuglike tye en die Witpad by Langebaan. Fundamina (Pretoria) [online]. 2013, vol.19, n.1, pp.48-60. ISSN 2411-7870.

The origin of the principles constituting the doctrine of vetustas can be traced back to the Digest. It would be wrong, it is submitted, to regard it as a fully-fledged doctrine in Roman law. The doctrine was developed in European countries under the influence of canon law and particularly through the works of the Pandectists. According to the basic principles of vetustas the public obtains a right to make use of some "public servitude" such as a road or aquaduct on account of usage by the public of such facility since time immemorial. "Time immemorial" in the classic sense means since a moment in time that is unknown to any living person. It is permissible to produce hearsay evidence in terms of which people who are still alive testify that their forbears already made use of the facility or construction. There are many older South African cases in which the principles of immemorial user or immemorial custom have been applied, often without referring to old authorities or even mentioning vetustas. However, in later cases the principles of vetustas as such were spelled out and applied. The South African courts relaxed the rule a bit by accepting that a right has indeed been exercised since time immemorial if it is proved that the usage has been in existence for more than thirty years and no evidence rebutting the presumption that is created in the process can be adduced. Vetustas, although showing similarities with prescription, should not be confused or placed on an equal footing with servitutes created through prescription, because there are important differences, as is pointed out in the article. Vetustas is not the type of doctrine that attracts the attention of the courts too often. Very recently, however, a case was reported in which vetustas was applied. The decision is The Langebaan Ratepayers' and Residents' Association v Dormell Properties 391 (Pty) Ltd 2013 (1) SA 37 (WCC). The court found in this case that the public obtained a right to use a certain road through use since time immemorial. This article fairly comprehensively deals with the decision in this case and the background to the dispute.

        · texto en Africano     · Africano ( pdf )


Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons