SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.65 número2Mechanical behaviour of semi-rigid connections coupling two concrete segmental liningsThe liquefaction potential of the upper quaternary sands of the Cape Flats, Western Cape, South Africa índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering

versión On-line ISSN 2309-8775
versión impresa ISSN 1021-2019

Resumen

WATES, J A. Design criteria for upstream raised tailings storage facilities. J. S. Afr. Inst. Civ. Eng. [online]. 2023, vol.65, n.2, pp.10-16. ISSN 2309-8775.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2309-8775/2023/v65n2a2.

For more than 100 years upstreaming has been the dominant raising method for tailings storage facilities in Southern Africa. However, there is a growing view worldwide that upstreaming is inherently less safe than centreline or downstream raising of tailings storage facilities. Considering that more than 90% of the 250 plus operational tailings storing facilities in Southern Africa are upstream raised and cannot economically be converted to, or replaced by, downstream raised facilities, the arguments for and against upstreaming were examined in this study. It was found that no compelling reason exists to ban upstreaming in Southern Africa, provided that failure mechanisms are thoroughly considered to prevent serious design omissions. The ALARP (as low as reasonably practicable) approach is introduced as a practical method to deal with the risk of failure, and its hierarchical application is illustrated.

Palabras clave : tailings; upstreaming; risk; ALARP; deposition.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons