Services on Demand
Article
Indicators
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in Google
Share
Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering
On-line version ISSN 2309-8775
Print version ISSN 1021-2019
Abstract
GERICKE, O J and SMITHERS, J C. Are estimates of catchment response time inconsistent as used in current flood hydrology practice in South Africa?. J. S. Afr. Inst. Civ. Eng. [online]. 2016, vol.58, n.1, pp.02-15. ISSN 2309-8775. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2309-8775/2016/v58n1a1.
Catchment response time parameters are one of the primary inputs required when design floods, especially in ungauged catchments, need to be estimated. The time of concentration (TC) is the most frequently used time parameter in flood hydrology practice, and continues to find application in both event-based methods and continuous hydrological models. Despite the widespread use of the TC, a unique working definition and equation(s) are currently lacking in South Africa. This paper presents the results of the direct and indirect TCestimation for three sets of catchments, which highlight their inherent variability and inconsistencies. These case studies demonstrate that estimates of TC, using different equations, may differ from one another by up to 800%. As a consequence of this high variability and uncertainty, we recommend that, for design hydrology and calibration purposes, observed TCvalues should be estimated using both the average catchment TCvalue, which is based on the event means, and a linear catchment response function. This approach is not only practical, but also proved to be objective and consistent in the study areas investigated in this paper.
Keywords : catchment response time; lag time; peak discharge; time of concentration; time to peak.