SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número1Understanding the influence of 24-hour movement behaviours on the health and development of preschool children from low-income South African settings: the SUNRISE pilot studyObjective sleep patterns and validity of self-reported sleep monitoring across different playing levels in rugby union índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


South African Journal of Sports Medicine

versão On-line ISSN 2078-516X
versão impressa ISSN 1015-5163

Resumo

KEMLER, E; CORNELISSEN, MH  e  GOUTTEBARGE, V. The effectiveness of an online intervention in stimulating injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners: Results of a randomised controlled trial. SA J. Sports Med. [online]. 2021, vol.33, n.1, pp.1-9. ISSN 2078-516X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2078-516x/2021/v33i1a11297.

BACKGROUND: The online intervention Runfitcheck was developed to stimulate injury-preventive behaviour among adult novice runners OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effectiveness of Runfitcheck on injury-preventive behaviour among adult novice runners METHODS: A randomised controlled trial was conducted among adult novice runners. The intervention group had access to the Runfitcheck intervention, the control group performed their running activities as usual. One, three, and five months after enrolment, participants reported retrospectively what they had done regarding injury-preventive behaviour (operationalised as (i) using a (personalised) training schedule; (ii) performing strength and technique exercises; and (iii) performing a warm-up routine prior to running). Relative Risks (RR) and 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) were used to analyse behavioural change. RESULTS: The intervention group (n=715) searched more often for information about a warm-up routine (RR 1.211; 95%CI 1.0801.357), and added more often strength exercises to their warm-up routine (RR 1.228; 95%CI 1.092-1.380). The intervention group performed more often running technique exercises compared to the control group (n=696) (RR 1.134; 95%CI 1.015-1.267), but less often strength exercises (RR 0.865 (95%CI 0.752-0.995). Within the group of runners that did not perform any warm-up routine at enrolment (n=272), the intervention group started to perform a regular warm-up routine more often than the control group (RR 1.461; 95%CI 1.084-1.968). No significant results were found for using a training schedule. CONCLUSION: The online intervention Runfitcheck was effective in stimulating aspects of injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners, mostly related to a warm-up routine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL6225, Registered April 24th 2007 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6225

Palavras-chave : behaviour; running; primary prevention; tailor-made; intervention.

        · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons