Services on Demand
Article
Indicators
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in Google
Share
Old Testament Essays
On-line version ISSN 2312-3621
Print version ISSN 1010-9919
Abstract
WYNAND RETIEF, C.. The Anti-Yahweh Label lassaw' in Jeremiah (Part 2). Old testam. essays [online]. 2022, vol.35, n.1, pp.128-139. ISSN 2312-3621. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2312-3621/2022/v35n1a9.
The traditional stance is that –—“•” in Jeremiah (2:30; 4:30; 6:29; 18:15 and 46:11) denotes futility, mostly translated as "in vain. " This study, the second of a sequel, scrutinises the last two texts (Jer 18:15 and 46:11) in an effort to substantiate and modify a recent hypothesis that the term is instead a reference to the god Baal, "The Vain/Worthless One. " Jeremiah 18:15 has an interpretative tradition that acknowledges –—“•” as a referent to the (worthless) idols. The present study offers a basis for this interpretation. As Egypt (in Jer 46) can hardly be connected to Baal worship, 46:11 modifies the notion that –—“•” functions as an identifier of the god Baal per se and confirms the wisdom of ancient translators of Jer 18:15 who labelled –—“•” as unspecified deities. The traditional stance that –—“•” denotes futility, could only be refuted in 46:11 by a search for intertextual clues, alertness to connecting metaphors and accompanying gender switches. These are the very same rhetorical devices illustrated in Mary Shields' study of Jer 3:1-4:4. The title of her work harbours the insight that –—“•” in 46:11, and by implication in all MT Jeremiah texts, serves as a dense metaphor circumscribing the prostitute-in-covenant-relationship with her (collective or individual) overlord/s (ba'al/be 'alïm).
Keywords : Jeremiah; exegesis; Baal; deities; worthless.