SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.76 issue1Rediscovering the ancient hermeneutic of Rebekah's characterSpirit baptism and the doctrine of initial evidence in African Pentecostal Christianity: A critical analysis author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


HTS Theological Studies

On-line version ISSN 2072-8050
Print version ISSN 0259-9422

Abstract

PIETERSE, Hendrik J.C.. The Grounded Theory methodology to conduct content analysis of sermons and interviews: Critique and response. Herv. teol. stud. [online]. 2020, vol.76, n.1, pp.1-5. ISSN 2072-8050.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hts.v76i1.5851.

The search for a good method to analyse sermon content (and the content of interview documents) has been prevailing since the past decades to evaluate current practice so as to construct better theories for practice. I think that we have found it in the methodology of inductive, qualitative research of the Grounded Theory methodology. In this article, I am going to use the Grounded Theory approach to describe the phases of qualitative empirical research, namely, literature study, sampling, open coding of the data, selective coding of additional new data and theoretical coding to be able to construct an emerging theory of praxis using the concepts developed for this specific action in our discipline. There are critical comments for this methodology. I will try to address these critical views and argue that the Grounded Theory is in line with the science of research.

Keywords : Grounded Theory analysis; content analysis; sermons and interview documents; critique on method; response to critique.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License