SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.65 número1Isaiah 36-39: rethinking the issues of priority and historical reliabilityThe adjudication of miracles: rethinking the criteria of historicity índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


HTS Theological Studies

versão On-line ISSN 2072-8050
versão impressa ISSN 0259-9422

Resumo

LICONA, Michael R.  e  VAN DER WATT, Jan G.. Historians and miracles: the principle of analogy and antecedent probability reconsidered. Herv. teol. stud. [online]. 2009, vol.65, n.1. ISSN 2072-8050.

Most Biblical scholars and historians hold that the investigation of a miracle report lies outside of the rights of historians acting within their professional capacity. In this article, I challenge this assertion and argue to the contrary: Historians are within their professional rights to investigate miracle claims and to adjudicate on the historicity of the events. I present a positive case for the historian's right to adjudicate on miracle claims and address two major objections to this conclusion: the principle of analogy and antecedent probability. At times I use the resurrection of Jesus as an example. This is the first of two articles. In the second, I will address three additional common objections: the theological objection, the lack of consensus and miracle claims in multiple religions.

Palavras-chave : miracles; principle of analogy; antecedent probability; historicity of miracle stories; Biblical hermeneutics.

        · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons