SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.65 número1Isaiah 36-39: rethinking the issues of priority and historical reliabilityThe adjudication of miracles: rethinking the criteria of historicity índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


HTS Theological Studies

versión On-line ISSN 2072-8050
versión impresa ISSN 0259-9422

Resumen

LICONA, Michael R.  y  VAN DER WATT, Jan G.. Historians and miracles: the principle of analogy and antecedent probability reconsidered. Herv. teol. stud. [online]. 2009, vol.65, n.1. ISSN 2072-8050.

Most Biblical scholars and historians hold that the investigation of a miracle report lies outside of the rights of historians acting within their professional capacity. In this article, I challenge this assertion and argue to the contrary: Historians are within their professional rights to investigate miracle claims and to adjudicate on the historicity of the events. I present a positive case for the historian's right to adjudicate on miracle claims and address two major objections to this conclusion: the principle of analogy and antecedent probability. At times I use the resurrection of Jesus as an example. This is the first of two articles. In the second, I will address three additional common objections: the theological objection, the lack of consensus and miracle claims in multiple religions.

Palabras clave : miracles; principle of analogy; antecedent probability; historicity of miracle stories; Biblical hermeneutics.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons