SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.113 número4 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


SAMJ: South African Medical Journal

versión On-line ISSN 2078-5135
versión impresa ISSN 0256-9574

Resumen

CHIMATIRO, C S et al. Barriers affecting COVID-19 vaccination in Phalombe District, Malawi: A qualitative study. SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. [online]. 2023, vol.113, n.4, pp.1150-1155. ISSN 2078-5135.  http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2023.v113i4.16654.

BACKGROUND: In Malawi, only 1 072 229 people out of a national target population of 13 546 324 had received at least one dose of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine by 26 December 2021, and only 672 819 people were classified as fully vaccinated. Phalombe District in Malawi had particularly low COVID-19 vaccine uptake, with only 4% (n=8 538) of 225 219 people being fully vaccinated by 26 December OBJECTIVES: To explore reasons for vaccine hesitancy and refusal among people living in Phalombe District METHODS: This cross-sectional qualitative study employed six focus group discussions (FGDs) and 19 in-depth interviews (IDIs) to collect data. We purposefully selected two traditional authorities (TAs), Nazombe and Nkhumba, as study areas, and conducted FGDs and IDIs in 6 randomly selected villages in these two TAs. Participants were religious leaders, traditional leaders, youths, traditional healers and ordinary community members. We explored reasons for vaccine refusal and hesitancy, how contextual cultural beliefs influenced people's decision to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, and which sources of information were trusted in the community. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis RESULTS: We conducted 19 IDIs and six FGDs. Themes that emerged from the data were reasons for vaccine refusal and hesitancy, contextual cultural beliefs affecting the decision whether to be vaccinated, ways to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake, and means of communicating information about COVID-19 vaccines. Participants mentioned that myths contributing to vaccine refusal and hesitancy circulated in the community through social media. With regard to contextual cultural beliefs, most participants believed that COVID-19 was a disease of rich people, while others believed that it signalled the end of the world and that it could not be cured CONCLUSION: Health systems should recognise and acknowledge the reasons leading to vaccine hesitancy and refusal and address these appropriately to improve vaccine uptake. Effective community sensitisation and engagement should be enhanced to clarify myths and address misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons