SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.110 issue2An analysis of recent stroke cases in South Africa: Trend, seasonality and predictorsUnderstanding the basics of cannabidiol from cannabis to apply to therapeutics in epilepsy author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google


SAMJ: South African Medical Journal

On-line version ISSN 2078-5135
Print version ISSN 0256-9574


MCQUOID-MASON, D J. Parents refusing blood transfusions for their children solely on religious grounds: Who must apply for the court order?. SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. [online]. 2020, vol.110, n.2, pp.100-101. ISSN 2078-5135.

The South African Constitution provides that children have the right to healthcare, as well as all other rights. Furthermore, in all matters affecting them, their best interests must be 'of paramount importance'. It seems common practice that, when parents refuse blood transfusions for their children solely on religious grounds, doctors and health authorities apply for a court order to overturn such refusals. However, since the implementation of the Children's Act of 2005, it may be that the onus is no longer on doctors and authorities to apply to court to reverse the decision of parents and guardians. It can be argued instead that the burden has shifted to the parents to apply to court for an order to overrule the decision of doctors, by proving to the court that alternative choices are available. Guidance is given for situations, particularly in the public sector, where alternative choices are not available.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )


Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License