SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.109 issue7Characterisation of protease resistance mutations in a South African paediatric cohort with virological failure, 2011 - 2017INTERGROWTH-21st v. local South African growth standards (Theron-Thompson) for identification of small-for-gestational-age fetuses in stillbirths: A closer look at variation across pregnancy author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


SAMJ: South African Medical Journal

On-line version ISSN 2078-5135
Print version ISSN 0256-9574

Abstract

MCCAUL, J et al. Workmen's compensation for occupational hand injuries. SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. [online]. 2019, vol.109, n.7, pp.516-518. ISSN 2078-5135.  http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/samj.2019.v109i7.13747.

BACKGROUND: The Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act No. 130 of 1993, as amended in 1997 (COIDA), provides payment to healthcare providers for treatment of occupational injuries in South Africa (SA). Patients and employers are often unaware of procedures for claiming, and patients then carry the burden of costs themselves. Additionally, under-billing results in a loss of income for treating hospitals. Hand injuries are common occupational injuries and form the focus of this studyOBJECTIVES: To investigate whether occupational hand injuries treated at the Martin Singer Hand Unit at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, were accurately captured and allocated correct professional fee coding and billing. Accurate capturing and billing would allow for access to the Compensation Fund and allocation of finances to improve service delivery, as well as avoid unnecessary costs to otherwise uninsured patientsMETHODS: All new hand injuries presenting to the hand unit at the hospital in August 2017 were sampled in a retrospective folder review. Injuries on duty (IODs) were identified and analysed further. Coding and billing were compared with independent private quotesRESULTS: Sixty new hand injuries presented during the month. Fifteen were IODs, but only 6 were recognised by administration. The other 9 were billed at minimum income rates and 5 of these patients also had operations, which were not billed for. A total of ZAR88 871.99 was under-billed in terms of professional fees only. The 9 incorrectly classified patients had to bear costs themselves at a median of ZAR130.00 eachCONCLUSIONS: There were large discrepancies in billing for occupational hand injuries. This resulted in costs to the patients and loss of income for the facility. Access to the Compensation Fund is vital in financing resources in the overburdened public sector. Suggestions for improvement include accessing COIDA funds in order to improve administration at the unit, so improving identification, coding and billing of occupational hand injuries

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License