SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.109 issue4The utility of hand-held mobile spirometer technology in a resource-constrained settingHIV self-screening distribution preferences and experiences among men who have sex with men in Mpumalanga Province: Informing policy for South Africa author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


SAMJ: South African Medical Journal

On-line version ISSN 2078-5135
Print version ISSN 0256-9574

Abstract

TRATARIS-REBISZ, A N et al. Spotted fever rickettsiosis in South Africa: Evaluation of laboratory diagnostic capacity and inter-laboratory comparison of serological testing. SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. [online]. 2019, vol.109, n.4, pp.223-226. ISSN 2078-5135.  http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/samj.2019.v109i4.13788.

BACKGROUND: Spotted fever rickettsiosis, also known as tick bite fever (TBF), is a common infectious disease in South Africa (SA). Although the diagnosis of TBF is often based on clinical grounds only, laboratory testing is important to confirm the diagnosis and can contribute to case management in the light of a myriad of differential diagnoses, and in complicated cases OBJECTIVES: To report on the availability and scope of laboratory tests for investigating suspected cases of TBF in SA, and the outcome of an inter-laboratory comparison (ILC) conducted for serological tests METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was circulated to major pathology laboratories in SA to determine what TBF tests they offered for TBF investigation. In addition, a clinical panel was provided to willing laboratories in order to perform an ILC of the serological tests RESULTS: Serological tests for TBF were available from five laboratories serving both the private and state medical sectors in SA. There was no standardised testing platform or result interpretation across the different laboratories. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests were less frequently available, and not available to state-operated facilities. The outcome of the ILC indicated varied performance and interpretation of serological results for TBF CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory investigation for TBF is routinely and widely available in SA. Both serological and PCR-based methods were varied, and the lack of standardisation and interpretation of tests needs to be addressed to improve the overall quality of TBF diagnosis in SA. The utility of ILC to identify problem areas in serological testing for TBF is highlighted, and laboratories in SA are encouraged to use it to improve the quality of testing

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License