SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.108 issue8 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


SAMJ: South African Medical Journal

On-line version ISSN 2078-5135
Print version ISSN 0256-9574

Abstract

DHAI, A  and  MAHOMED, S. The National Education, Health and Allied Workers' Union (NEHAWU) strikes: South Africa's healthcare battlefield. SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. [online]. 2018, vol.108, n.8, pp.632-633. ISSN 2078-5135.  http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/samj.2018.v108i8.13458.

The right to strike is a fundamental right entrenched in section 23 of the Bill of Rights. Strikes are an almost everyday occurrence in South Africa and strikes in healthcare facilities raise difficult and complex moral and ethical questions. The right to strike is conditionally limited by section 36 of the Constitution and for workers engaging in essential services it is further limited under section 65 of the Labour Relations Act. Healthcare practitioners, including emergency care personnel, and much-needed healthcare facilities have come under attack during the National Education, Health and Allied Workers' Union (NEHAWU) strikes, which have prevented patients from accessing healthcare and threatened the training of undergraduate students and registrars. While generally security and policing have been lacking at targeted facilities, many doctors stood by their patients despite threats to their safety. Healthcare facilities, vehicles and practitioners must be protected. Solutions must come from politicians and include preventive actions and enforcement of the law.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License