SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.107 issue10User perspectives on Implanon NXT in South Africa: A survey of 12 public-sector facilitiesGaps in monitoring systems for Implanon NXT services in South Africa: An assessment of12 facilities in two districts author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


SAMJ: South African Medical Journal

On-line version ISSN 2078-5135
Print version ISSN 0256-9574

Abstract

ADEAGBO, O A et al. Uptake and early removals of Implanon NXT in South Africa: Perceptions and attitudes of healthcare workers. SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. [online]. 2017, vol.107, n.10, pp.822-826. ISSN 2078-5135.  http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/samj.2017.v107i10.12821.

BACKGROUND. The South African (SA) government introduced Implanon NXT, a long-acting subdermal contraceptive implant, in 2014 to expand contraceptive choice. Following an initial high uptake, its use declined considerably amid reports of early removals and frequent side-effects. We examine providers' perceptions of training and attitudes towards Implanon NXT, as well as their views on the causes of early removals and the impact on the implant service. OBJECTIVE. To assess healthcare providers' perceptions and attitudes towards implant services in SA. METHODS. In-depth interviews were conducted with eight nurses providing implant services in public facilities in Gauteng and North West Province. Emerging themes were identified, manually coded and thematically analysed following an interpretivism approach. RESULTS. Nurses lacked confidence in providing implant services effectively, particularly removals, which they ascribed to the brief, cascade-type training received. Nurses generally held negative views towards the method. They also reported that side-effects are the most common reason for early removals - particularly irregular bleeding - and that men often do not support their partners who use the method. Lastly, it was found that providers require guidance on counselling regarding the method and standardised guidelines on the management of side-effects. CONCLUSION. Retraining and support of providers are needed to address competency gaps and negative attitudes towards the method. Assessment of providers' readiness to perform removal procedures is also important. Finally, effective plans are necessary to improve implant continuation rates, especially among women whose partners are unsupportive.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License