SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.53 número2History, rationale, and lessons learned: Thresholds of potential concern in Kruger National Park river adaptive managementImplementing invasive species management in an adaptive management framework índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Bookmark

    Koedoe

    versión impresa ISSN 0075-6458

    Resumen

    VAN WILGEN, Brian W; GOVENDER, Navashni; FORSYTH, Gregory G  y  KRAAIJ, Tineke. Towards adaptive fire management for biodiversity conservation: Experience in South African National Parks. Koedoe [online]. 2011, vol.53, n.2, pp. 96-104. ISSN 0075-6458.

    ABSTRACT This paper reviews the experience gained in three South African national parks (Kruger, Table Mountain and Bontebok) with regard to the adaptive management of fire for the conservation of biodiversity. In the Kruger National Park, adaptive approaches have evolved over the past 15 years, beginning initially as a form of 'informed trial and error', but progressing towards active adaptive management in which landscape-scale, experimental burning treatments are being applied in order to learn. In the process, significant advances in understanding regarding the role and management of fire have been made. Attempts have been made to transfer the approaches developed in Kruger National Park to the other two national parks. However, little progress has been made to date, both because of a failure to provide an agreed context for the introduction of adaptive approaches, and because (in the case of Bontebok National Park) too little time has passed to be able to make an assessment. Fire management interventions, ultimately, will manifest themselves in terms of biodiversity outcomes, but definite links between fire interventions and biodiversity outcomes have yet to be made. CONSERVATION IMPLICATIONS: Significant challenges face the managers of fire-prone and fire adapted ecosystems, where the attainment of ecosystem goals may require approaches (like encouraging high-intensity fires at hot and dry times of the year) that threaten societal goals related to safety. In addition, approaches to fire management have focused on encouraging particular fire patterns in the absence of a sound understanding of their ecological outcomes. Adaptive management offers a framework for addressing these issues, but will require higher levels of agreement, monitoring and assessment than have been the case to date

            · texto en Inglés     · pdf en Inglés