SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.63 número1King Kong adapatations (1959-2017): Transversing culture and society"Realness" in images: The adaptation of verbatim text to stage images with specific reference to tot stof | tot stilte - 'n paniekreaksie (2018) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe

versión On-line ISSN 2224-7912
versión impresa ISSN 0041-4751

Resumen

MEINTJES, Zanétte. Hedging: The occurrence and use of restriction and restraint markers in students' argumentative texts. Tydskr. geesteswet. [online]. 2023, vol.63, n.1, pp.65-82. ISSN 2224-7912.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2023/v63n1a4.

Metadiscourse is divided into two categories, namely textual and interpersonal metadiscourse. Textual metadiscourse involves the use of words and phrases to organise textual information in a coherent way, while interpersonal metadiscourse enables the author to establish a writer-reader relationship. Hedges that form part of the interpersonal metadiscourse category are specifically used to qualify author positions. First, hedging softens author points of view to a possibility, thus creating space for the reader's opinion regarding the topic of discussion. Secondly, it shows when a writer distances himself/herself from the views therein and/or even the evaluation thereof. The literature is characterised by various studies regarding the use of hedging in academic texts, but there is a gap with respect to its use specifically in Afrikaans-speaking first-year students' written texts. This article sheds light on the type of hedges used by these students; the frequency in use of hedges over all three parts of the texts, namely the introduction, the body (content part) and the conclusion; whether the hedges are used correctly and appropriately; and whether there is a significant difference in the use of hedges between students who received below-average, average and above-average marks for their written arguments. The results of this investigation show that Afrikaans-speaking first-year students at the start of their university careers are not necessarily experienced in the use of hedging. Restriction and restraint markers rarely figured in the arguments. Therefore, it is recommended that Afrikaans-speaking first-year students at university should be acculturated in Academic literacy modules in the importance and use of hedging in their written arguments.

Palabras clave : metadiscourse; textual metadiscourse; interpersonal metadiscourse; Afrikaans-speaking first-year students; written arguments; hedging; restriction markers; restraint markers.

        · resumen en Africano     · texto en Africano     · Africano ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons