SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.60 issue3Bioring® gastric banding for obesity in a private South African hospital author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Surgery

On-line version ISSN 2078-5151
Print version ISSN 0038-2361

Abstract

IGWE, PO; DODIYI-MANUEL, A  and  WICHENDU, PN. A randomised control trial of intraoperative and early outcome in scalpel versus monopolar diathermy for midline abdominal incisions. S. Afr. j. surg. [online]. 2022, vol.60, n.3, pp.167-170. ISSN 2078-5151.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2078-5151/sajs3642.

BACKGROUND: Cutting diathermy is an alternative to scalpel for all layers of abdominal entry despite the perception that it impairs healing, increases infection risk and has worse cosmesis. This prospective, randomised, controlled trial was carried out to compare the intraoperative and early outcome in diathermy to scalpel for midline abdominal incisions in general surgery METHODS: The study was conducted from 1 October 2014 to 31 May 2016. Ethical approval was obtained. The incision time, wound size or area, and volume of blood loss were determined for each group of diathermy and scalpel. Results were analysed with SPSS version 23.0 RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-four patients (93.6%) met the inclusion criteria and were successfully randomised to mode of entry incision - group A monopolar diathermy (118 patients), and group B scalpel (116 patients). The mean incision time was 3.9 ± 1.6 minutes, wound size or area was 54.8 ± 24.4 cm2, volume of blood loss was 46.0 ± 25.5 ml and volume of blood loss per area was 0.99 ± 0.7 ml/cm2 for group A, while the mean incision time was 5.6 ± 2.5 minutes, wound size or area was 57.3 ± 27.3 cm2, volume of blood loss was 62.2 ± 30.6 ml and volume of blood loss per area was 1.3 ml/cm2 ± 0.8 for group B, respectively. The differences in these means were statistically significant CONCLUSION: Incisions made with diathermy resulted in shorter incision time and lesser blood loss when compared to that made with the scalpel. There was no difference in the rate of surgical site infection. These procedural results favour the use of diathermy for abdominal entry

Keywords : intraoperative; early outcome in scalpel; monopolar diathermy; midline abdominal incisions.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License