SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.119 número7-8In defence of exploratory research: A reply to critics índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


South African Journal of Science

versión On-line ISSN 1996-7489
versión impresa ISSN 0038-2353

Resumen

AHMED, Khatija et al. Addressing missed visits to improve retention of young South African women in clinical trials. S. Afr. j. sci. [online]. 2023, vol.119, n.7-8, pp.1-5. ISSN 1996-7489.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2023/13809.

In clinical trials, a vital protocol requirement for participants is adherence to scheduled visits. A substantial number of missed visits and the resultant missing data could affect generalisability of the findings and undermine the scientific conclusions. We aimed to investigate the extent of and reasons for missed visits in the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) trial in order to optimise recruitment and retention practices. Despite being a multi-country study, we investigated missed visits only at Setshaba Research Centre in Soshanguve, Tshwane, South Africa. Of 810 participants enrolled at Setshaba Research Centre, 94 (11.6%) participants missed visits and 231 missed visits were recorded. Of the 94 participants who missed visits, 53 (56.4%) missed at least two visits; 37 (39.4%) missed three or more visits, and of these, 32 (86.5%) missed at least two visits for the same reason. Overall, the main reasons for missed visits were: participant had to work (60; 26.0%), unable to contact participant (60; 26.0%), participant relocated (32; 13.9%), and participant travelled out of area (23; 10%). The large proportion of participants who missed two or more visits indicates that participants who miss a single visit are likely to miss even more, often for the same reason. Site staff need to be vigilant to detect any trends in missed visits early and innovative in developing personalised strategies to minimise missed visits and retain participants until completion of their scheduled visits. SIGNIFICANCE: • Despite trial site staff developing strategies to minimise missed visits, they will not be able to anticipate all scenarios. • Participants' work commitments, loss of contact with participants, and participants' travel/relocation to distant areas were the main reasons for missing visits, and site staff need to consider the potential for these to arise during the course of the study when assessing potential participants at enrolment and at each follow-up visit. • Case report forms designed for multi-country studies should be adapted to reflect the most likely reasons for missed visits for the local situation, so that trends in missed visits can be identified and addressed early.

Palabras clave : clinical trials; retention; protocol adherence; missed visits.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons