SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.116 issue3-4Automatic classification of social media reports on violent incidents in South Africa using machine learningResearch productivity in science and its relationship to race in South Africa author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Science

On-line version ISSN 1996-7489
Print version ISSN 0038-2353

Abstract

JAGER, Kylie de; CHIMHUNDU, Chipo; HARLEY, Yolande X.R.  and  DOUGLAS, Tania S.. Collaboration and citation impact: Trends in health sciences research at the University of Cape Town. S. Afr. j. sci. [online]. 2020, vol.116, n.3-4, pp.1-8. ISSN 1996-7489.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/6132.

Against a background of substantial growth in publication output in health sciences at the University of Cape Town (UCT) over the past two decades, we examined the relationship between collaboration with domestic and foreign institutions and resulting citations of co-published work. We report on trends in authorship and citation impact for health sciences research at UCT across three 3-year periods: 1999-2001, 2006-2008 and 2013-2015. We examined numbers of collaborative publications with domestic and foreign co-authors; the status of collaboration with other African countries; the location of the 'drivers' of the research (with 'drivers' indicated by first or last authorship); and expected and observed citation counts - used as an indicator of impact - over time. We found that the relative citation rate of the set of UCT health sciences publications has increased; the set of 1999-2001 publications was less frequently cited than expected for the journals in which the publications appear, while the 2006-2008 and 2013-2015 sets were cited more frequently than expected. Relative citation rates were greater for papers for which UCT shared international co-authorship than for papers with UCT-only or domestic co-authorship. Our findings confirm reports in the literature of higher citation of internationally co-authored publications. We additionally found that the publications with the highest relative citation rates were driven by authors from foreign institutions.SIGNIFICANCE: • Methods are presented for extracting, measuring, analysing and representing the citation impact of collaborative research. • The relative citation rate of health sciences publications produced by UCT has increased and co-publication with international authors has increased. • The findings confirm reports in the literature of higher citation of publications co-authored with international collaborators. • An apparent influence of foreign drivers on citation impact, holds risk for South African science.

Keywords : bibliometrics; relative citation rate; impact factor; co-authorship.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License