SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.113 issue3-4Determining the relationship between invasive alien species density and a country's socio-economic statusNo 'free ride' for African women: a comparison of head-loading versus back-loading among Xhosa women author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Science

On-line version ISSN 1996-7489
Print version ISSN 0038-2353

Abstract

KRAMERS, Jan D.  and  DIRKS, Paul H.G.M.. The age of fossil StW573 ('Little Foot'): An alternative interpretation of 26Al/10Be burial data. S. Afr. j. sci. [online]. 2017, vol.113, n.3-4, pp.1-8. ISSN 1996-7489.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/20160085.

Following the publication (Granger DE et al., Nature 2015;522:85-88) of an 26Al/10Be burial isochron age of 3.67±0.16 Ma for the sediments encasing hominin fossil StW573 ('Little Foot'), we consider data on chert samples presented in that publication to explore alternative age interpretations. 10Be and 26Al concentrations determined on individual chert fragments within the sediments were calculated back in time, and data from one of these fragments point to a maximum age of 2.8 Ma for the sediment package and therefore also for the fossil. An alternative hypothesis is explored, which involves re-deposition and mixing of sediment that had previously collected over time in an upper chamber, which has since been eroded. We show that it is possible for such a scenario to yield ultimately an isochron indicating an apparent age much older than the depositional age of the sediments around the fossil. A possible scenario for deposition of StW573 in Member 2 would involve the formation of an opening between the Silberberg Grotto and an upper chamber. Not only could such an opening have acted as a death trap, but it could also have disturbed the sedimentological balance in the cave, allowing unconsolidated sediment to be washed into the Silberberg Grotto. This two-staged burial model would thus allow a younger age for the fossil, consistent with the sedimentology of the deposit. This alternative age is also not in contradiction to available faunal and palaeomagnetic data. SIGNIFICANCE: • Data on chert samples taken close to StW573 impose a maximum age for the fossil of 2.8 Ma - younger than the 3.67 Ma originally reported. We propose and explore a two-stage burial scenario to resolve the inconsistency and to reopen the discussion on the age of fossil StW573.

Keywords : dating; cosmogenic nuclides; muons; Australopithecus prometheus; burial history.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License