SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.106 número11-12Turbidity removal: gravel and charcoal as roughing filtration mediaThe influence of deposition temperature on vanadium dioxide thin films microstructure and physical properties índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


South African Journal of Science

versión On-line ISSN 1996-7489

Resumen

EDOSOMWAN, J  y  EDOSOMWAN, TO. Comparative analysis of some search engines. S. Afr. j. sci. [online]. 2010, vol.106, n.11-12, pp. 1-4. ISSN 1996-7489.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v106i11/12.169.

We compared the information retrieval performances of some popular search engines (namely, Google, Yahoo, AlltheWeb, Gigablast, Zworks and AltaVista and Bing/MSN) in response to a list of ten queries, varying in complexity. These queries were run on each search engine and the precision and response time of the retrieved results were recorded. The first ten documents on each retrieval output were evaluated as being 'relevant' or 'non-relevant' for evaluation of the search engine's precision. To evaluate response time, normalised recall ratios were calculated at various cut-off points for each query and search engine. This study shows that Google appears to be the best search engine in terms of both average precision (70%) and average response time (2 s). Gigablast and AlltheWeb performed the worst overall in this study.

Palabras clave : catalogue; crawler; index; precision; response time; search engine; spider.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License