SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.106 issue11-12Turbidity removal: gravel and charcoal as roughing filtration mediaThe influence of deposition temperature on vanadium dioxide thin films microstructure and physical properties author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Science

On-line version ISSN 1996-7489
Print version ISSN 0038-2353

Abstract

EDOSOMWAN, J  and  EDOSOMWAN, TO. Comparative analysis of some search engines. S. Afr. j. sci. [online]. 2010, vol.106, n.11-12, pp.1-4. ISSN 1996-7489.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v106i11/12.169.

We compared the information retrieval performances of some popular search engines (namely, Google, Yahoo, AlltheWeb, Gigablast, Zworks and AltaVista and Bing/MSN) in response to a list of ten queries, varying in complexity. These queries were run on each search engine and the precision and response time of the retrieved results were recorded. The first ten documents on each retrieval output were evaluated as being 'relevant' or 'non-relevant' for evaluation of the search engine's precision. To evaluate response time, normalised recall ratios were calculated at various cut-off points for each query and search engine. This study shows that Google appears to be the best search engine in terms of both average precision (70%) and average response time (2 s). Gigablast and AlltheWeb performed the worst overall in this study.

Keywords : catalogue; crawler; index; precision; response time; search engine; spider.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License