Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
On-line version ISSN 2411-9717
MTEGHA, H.D.; CAWOOD, F.T. and MINNITT, R.C.A.. A comparison of the processes used during the development of the national mineral policies of Tanzania and Namibia. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. [online]. 2010, vol.110, n.10, pp. 611-620. ISSN 2411-9717.
Mining is important to the economies of both Tanzania and Namibia. Recently, both nations revised their national mineral policies to ensure future economic benefit. The main difference in the mineral policy-formulation processes followed by the two countries is identified as the degree and timing of stakeholder involvement during the articulation process. In the case of Namibia, the stakeholders were involved from the start in identifying issues and in suggesting policy solutions. In contrast, the Tanzanian process involved stakeholders after a framework had been developed by a task team. The Tanzanian emphasis was on attracting foreign investment into a traditionally state enterprise system of mineral investment and development. One can argue that the policies developed met the initial requirements, and both are, therefore successful, despite the different processes of policy formulation that were used. However, several fundamental questions arise as a result of the two approaches. This paper attempts to answer these questions by providing a comparison of the processes used for developing and formulating the mineral policies of Tanzania and Namibia. It concludes that the Namibian consultative process is perhaps more sustainable in the long-term because of its wider public support. Time will tell which of these policy-formulation processes provides a basis for sustainable economic growth for developing mineral economies.
Keywords : National; policy-formulation; stakeholder; investment; mineral development; consultative process.