Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Related links
-
Cited by Google
-
Similars in Google
Share
HTS Theological Studies
On-line version ISSN 2072-8050Print version ISSN 0259-9422
Herv. teol. stud. vol.81 n.1 Pretoria 2025
https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v81i1.10511
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Community land conflicts and pro-poor urban land access in Enugu, Nigeria: Church involvement for social inclusion
Christopher M. AnierobiI; Cletus O. ObasiII; Emeka E. ObiohaIII; Chukwuemeka D. OnyejegbuIV; Benjamin O. AjahV, VI
IDepartment of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Environmental Studies, University of Nigeria, Ntsukka, Nigeria
IIDepartment of Religion and Cultural Studies, Faculty of the Social Science, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
IIIDepartment of Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Humanities and Social Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa
IVDepartment of Political Science, Faculty of the Social Science, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
VDepartment of Sociology and Social Work, Faculty of the Social Sciences, National University of Lesotho, Roma, Lesotho
VIDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
ABSTRACT
Pro-poor land access for physical development is hindered by communal land conflicts in most developing countries like Nigeria, thereby inducing homelessness. As the capital city of the then Eastern Region of Nigeria, Enugu has witnessed communal land conflicts and associated challenges in urban expansion, infrastructure development and land-use planning. This study examines the dynamics of communal land conflicts, land access challenges and their socio-economic implications in Enugu, Nigeria. It highlights the role of the Church in promoting social inclusion and advocating for pro-poor initiatives. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining primary data from 40 respondents through structured interviews and observations, alongside secondary data from government reports, academic literature and church records. The study revealed systemic inefficiencies in land administration, driven by dual frameworks combining formal laws and informal practices. Key issues included the exploitation of compulsory acquisition laws, the marginalisation of vulnerable groups and the proliferation of informal settlements. The Church emerged as a significant actor, contributing to peacebuilding and community development through its socio-economic initiatives, advocacy for justice and grassroots engagement. The study concludes that integrating the Church into land governance frameworks presents a unique opportunity to resolve communal land conflicts, address systemic exclusions and promote sustainable urban development.
CONTRIBUTION: The study, among others, recommends harmonising formal and informal land systems, empowering marginalised groups, upgrading informal settlements and leveraging the Church's moral authority and resources to foster equitable land access and social inclusion
Keywords: physical development; pro-poor land access; communal land conflicts; the church; urban-peripheral communities.
Introduction
Gaining access to urban land is essential for attaining sustainable physical growth, especially in fast-urbanising areas like Enugu, Nigeria. The urbanisation of Enugu has led to heightened demand for land to facilitate infrastructure projects, residential needs and business operations. Nonetheless, urbanisation has consistently been plagued by land disputes that obstruct fair access to land resources and worsen socio-economic disparities (Aguilar, Flores & Lara 2022). These conflicts frequently arise from entrenched problems, such as historical disagreements, unclear land ownership systems, rival claims between traditional leaders and state authority, and the absence of a unified regulatory structure (Brandful & Nsomah 2017). The impact is especially harsh on urban poor populations, as they depend on stable and low-cost land access to fulfil their housing and livelihood requirements. While communal land conflicts are also prevalent in rural areas, this research specifically examines their impact on urban development, informal settlements and land tenure security for the urban poor in Enugu.
Conflicts over communal land pose challenges to physical development and also serve as a major source of social exclusion. As noted by Anierobi et al. (2024), low-income workers, women and migrants frequently face exclusion from urban land access because of systemic obstacles like discriminatory practices, corruption in land distribution and insufficient representation in decision-making. Corruption in land distribution is a major problem that maintains inequality in access to urban land. In numerous instances, Nuhu and Mpambije (2017) observe that land dealings are affected by corruption, partiality and a deficiency of openness in the distribution procedure. For example, Bhanye et al. (2024) contend that the lack of transparent land tenure systems and regulatory structures facilitates the growth of corrupt practices, eroding local communities' trust in formal land markets. For individuals with low incomes, women and migrants who lack the means or political influence to manoeuvre through these corrupt systems, obtaining land turns into an unmanageable challenge.
Alongside these challenges, insufficient representation in decision-making processes exacerbates the marginalisation of vulnerable groups. In numerous cases, decisions regarding urban land management are taken without sufficient dialogue with the individuals most impacted by these policies, especially those from marginalised communities (Davis et al. 2021; Haque & Sharifi 2024). For instance, women frequently do not possess the legal rights and cultural backing needed to obtain land in their names, even though they play essential roles in the economic stability of their families (Gonçalves, Ponchio & Basílio 2021; Supraptiningsih et al. 2023). Likewise, migrants, often marginalised from official land markets because of their status, end up confined in informal settlements with minimal legal safeguards (Agyabeng et al. 2022). The absence of representation in decision-making processes results in the neglect of these groups' concerns and needs, perpetuating the cycle of exclusion and restricting their chances for economic progress.
The Catholic Church, as a long-established institution with deep roots in Nigerian society, has traditionally played a crucial role in addressing social issues in Nigeria (Ogara 2024). While various Christian denominations contribute to social development, this study focusses specifically on the Catholic Church's role in land conflict resolution and social inclusion in Enugu. By leveraging its moral influence, community ties and support for the disadvantaged and marginalised, the church possesses a distinctive ability to aid in addressing community land disputes and promoting equitable land access. Religious groups have played a crucial role in fostering peacebuilding, resolving conflicts and advancing social welfare in various settings (Mrutu 2023), yet their ability to impact urban land governance is still mostly unexplored. Utilising its role as a respected intermediary, the church could promote discussions between opposing parties, champion pro-poor policies and back community-led initiatives to guarantee fair land distribution.
This research aims to examine the overlap between communal land disputes and equitable urban land access for physical development in Enugu, Nigeria, highlighting the possible contribution of the church in tackling these issues. By incorporating the church into the wider conversation about urban governance and fair development, this research aims to promote creative solutions to a significant challenge in urban land management in Nigeria. The results aim to add to scholarly conversations about sustainable urban development, offering actionable suggestions for policymakers, community leaders and faith-based organisations. Furthermore, the study emphasises the significance of inclusive strategies in land governance that focus on the needs of marginalised groups and promote a fairer and more equitable urban future.
Literature review
The topic of urban communal land disputes and their effects on access to land for the poor has received significant focus in urban development literature. Land disputes in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Nigeria, frequently stem from intertwined land tenure systems, conflicting interests and ineffective governance frameworks (Adekola, Krigsholm & Riekkinen 2023). Researchers have emphasised that communal land ownership, although it offers a sense of identity and safety for traditional communities, frequently turns into a point of conflict as urbanisation elevates the demand for land (Ntumva 2022; Nuhu 2021). In cities like Enugu, these conflicts are exacerbated by the absence of efficient dispute resolution mechanisms and the inclination of government officials to prioritise elite interests instead of addressing the needs of marginalised communities (Uzuegbunam & Nwofia 2014).
Research has consistently indicated that restricted access to urban land worsens socio-economic disparities, especially for the urban poor who encounter numerous systemic obstacles that impede their capacity to obtain land for housing, jobs and other income-generating activities (Adedeji 2023; Lawanson 2020). A major obstacle is the increasing expense of land in cities, which creates greater challenges for low-income families to obtain stable land rights. In numerous cities, such as Enugu, land prices have soared because of swift urbanisation, speculation and a growing demand for land, making it unaffordable for lower-income groups (Ankeli 2023). Alongside the high costs of land, the lack of transparency in land markets also makes access more difficult. The absence of clear land records, ambiguous property rights and bureaucratic delays foster conditions where informal transactions flourish, complicating the process for the poor to understand the system and obtain legal ownership (Rodima-Taylor 2021).
Discriminatory behaviours, whether official or unofficial, significantly contribute to the exclusion of vulnerable groups from accessing land. Such practices frequently appear as favouritism for affluent individuals or groups, along with systemic discrimination against marginalised communities, such as ethnic minorities, migrants and women (Haque & Sharifi 2024). The outcome is a skewed allocation of land that favours individuals with social, political or economic influence while placing the urban poor, who depend on affordable and secure land for their survival, at a disadvantage. These dynamics result in a harmful cycle, as the impoverished lack access to land, thereby restricting their capacity to accumulate wealth, invest in their families' prospects, or engage in the broader urban economy (Rigon 2022). In Nigeria, the gender aspects of land access are especially evident. Women, frequently a crucial support of informal urban economies, encounter particular difficulties in obtaining land because of cultural practices and legal obstacles. For example, Nchor (2022) note that in various regions of Nigeria, land is conventionally inherited via patriarchal systems, with women's rights to own or inherit land greatly restricted by both formal legal frameworks and customary traditions. These difficulties are intensified by the absence of legal structures that clearly safeguard women's land rights and by cultural norms that restrict women's participation in land markets and property deals (Ahmed 2024).
Research methods and design
Study design and study area
The study adopted a mixed-methods research design to comprehensively explore communal land conflicts and pro-poor urban land access for physical development in Enugu, Nigeria. The research was conducted across identified urban peripheral communities of Enugu, namely Ngwo (Ngwo, Ngwo Abuo, Ngwo Ato, Ngwo Ano, Ngwo Ise, Ngwo Isii and Ngwo Asaa), Nike (Ogui Nike, Onu-Ato, Umunnevo, Umuchigbo Iji Nike, Ako Nike, Akpogazi Nike and Ibeagwa Nike), Ugwuaji (Obeagu Ugwuaji and Amechi Ugwuaji), Akwuke, Obinagu, Obeagu and Amaechi Awkunanaw Autonomous Communities. Enugu is located in southeastern Nigeria and serves as the capital of Enugu State. It is an Igbo-dominated area with a mix of urban and rural communities experiencing rapid physical development. Data collection was conducted between January and March 2024, with a focus on understanding the intersection of land access, urban development and social inclusion (Figure 1).
Both primary and secondary data were utilised for this study. Secondary data were collected from journals, books, articles, government gazettes and reports of relevant institutions, including the National Population Commission (NPC 1991), the Enugu State Ministry of Lands and Urban Development, the Housing Authority and the Catholic Diocese of Enugu (2018). Key variables included communal land conflicts, government land acquisitions, land administration practices, urban population trends and physical development projects. These data provided a contextual background and informed the design of the primary data collection instruments.
Primary data were generated through structured interviews and direct personal observations. A total of 40 respondents were randomly selected using a stratified sampling technique to ensure representation of various stakeholder groups, including household heads, clergy and urban managers from the identified communities. Respondents provided insights on land access challenges, communal land conflicts and the role of the Catholic Church in promoting social inclusion. The study primarily draws from the Catholic Church's interventions, including its socio-economic initiatives, mediation efforts and advocacy for land justice. While other Christian denominations play roles in land governance, the empirical focus remains on Catholic institutions and programmes in Enugu. Observations were conducted to identify and document physical developments in the city, such as schools, health facilities, water schemes and housing projects, as well as areas affected by communal land conflicts. These observations provided direct visual evidence of the study issues.
A multistage sampling technique was employed to select participants from the various autonomous communities within the study area. The procedure began with stratification to ensure representation across different social groups and roles within the urban development landscape. Key strata included household heads, community members, clergy and urban managers actively involved in or affected by urban development and communal land conflicts. Within each stratum, snowball sampling was used to select respondents, ensuring fairness and eliminating bias. A sample size of 40 participants was obtained, matching the need for representativeness with the practical constraints of the study. This sample size was adequate to capture diverse perspectives while maintaining feasibility in data collection and analysis.
Data analysis
Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. We did this by reading and rereading the transcripts, noting any similarities and discrepancies between and within the accounts of the participants. A qualitative computer package (Nvivo 11, QSR) was used to organise and assist in the task of first-level analysis. Responses were further categorised within relevant themes. The content and format of transcripts were also described during the data analysis process.
Ethical considerations
The ethical approval was obtained from the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Health Research Ethics Committee (NHREC/08/09/20099-FWA00002221-1RB03004798). Informed consent was obtained from all participants before data collection, ensuring that they were fully briefed on the study's objectives, risks and benefits. Anonymity and confidentiality were maintained throughout the study. Permission to conduct the research was also sought and obtained from relevant community and institutional authorities.
Results
The results of this study highlight the complexities surrounding land administration, communal land conflicts and socio-economic exclusion in Enugu. These findings demonstrate systemic inefficiencies in land governance, the socio-economic implications of unplanned urban growth and the significant role of the Church in fostering peace and advocating for pro-poor initiatives. The results are presented in this section.
Land administration, tenure system and access for physical development in Enugu
The study revealed that Enugu's land administration operates under a dual framework: the Land Use Act (1978) and the Town and Country Planning Law (1946). Despite these formal mechanisms, the system is quasi-informal, combining formal regulations with informal practices. The Enugu State Ministry of Lands and Urban Development, alongside Local Government Authorities, oversees land administration but their efforts are often undermined by informal community practices. Issues such as outdated frameworks, including the unapproved 1979 master plan, were highlighted. This master plan, while used piecemeal, lacks formal adoption or relevance to current urban needs (Table 1).
Meanwhile, the absence of an updated regional or master plan has marginalised vulnerable groups, particularly the urban poor. Findings showed that a majority of the participants affirmed challenges such as poor record-keeping, inflated land prices and abuse of eminent domain powers. A respondent noted:
'We often hear about public interest when lands are seized by the government or other powerful entities, but the outcomes rarely benefit us, the locals. Instead, these lands are often allocated for projects that serve the elite or outsiders, leaving our communities displaced, marginalized, and deprived of the resources we rely on for survival.' (P9, Male, 49 years old)
Meanwhile, the participants were unanimous in saying that some native communities collaborate with corrupt officials to exploit the Land Use Act's compulsory acquisition clause, resulting in land usurpation. For instance, one participant shared:
'Selling off our paternal lands seems to be the only way to avoid losing them entirely to government agents who disguise themselves as land grabbers. These individuals take advantage of their authority and the compulsory acquisition provision in the Land Use Act to take our ancestral lands under the pretext of public interest. They assert that the purchases are intended for development or governmental initiatives, but in truth, the properties frequently transition into private ownership for individual gain. This situation leaves us, the legitimate proprietors, with no choice but to sell the land ourselves, wishing to maintain some control or advantage before everything is seized from us without adequate compensation or remedy.' (P21, Male, 55 years old)
This narratives indicates a deliberate and disguised form of land grabbing. The indigenes responded to this by selling off their landed property which they felt would be in danger of compulsory acquisition. Similarly, land deprivation, denial of access and land price inflation were noted as key exclusionary factors. Women and the poor are disproportionately affected, with participants affirming these challenges. A community member explained that:
'[E]ven when we try to fight back, the system favours the rich and connected individuals. We as ordinary people have no voice.' (P33, Female, 46 years old)
The narrative reflects a cycle of systemic injustices where institutional frameworks and practices consistently disadvantage the less privileged and reinforce their exclusion over time, as well as perpetuate broader socio-economic disparities and limit opportunities for equitable development.
The study further revealed that ancestral lands in peripheral communities have become sites of unplanned and poorly coordinated development. This phenomenon has resulted in the rapid emergence of informal settlements and squatter developments, often characterised by inadequate infrastructure and substandard living conditions. Participants unanimously linked these issues to the absence of proper land-use planning and oversight, as well as the unchecked encroachment of land speculators. Participants explained that these informal developments arise because of the high demand for affordable housing in urban and peri-urban areas, combined with weak enforcement of zoning regulations. One participant lamented:
'[W]hen developers come, they don't care about planning. They just build anywhere, and before you know it, the whole area becomes congested, with no roads, no drainage, nothing.' (P5, Male, 61 years old)
The lack of infrastructure in these areas exacerbates the challenges faced by residents, including poor access to clean water, sanitation and electricity. The study further highlighted that informal settlements and slum formation often lead to social and economic challenges, including increased crime rates, environmental degradation and public health risks. Another participant described the deteriorating conditions:
'Living here is a struggle. Floods come when it rains because there are no proper drains. Diseases spread quickly because there is no clean water or sanitation. It seems like we are forgotten.' (P2, Female, 39 years old)
The findings emphasise the urgent need for proper urban planning, community consultation and infrastructural development to address the issues associated with haphazard development and slum formation. Without strategic intervention, these trends could further marginalise already vulnerable communities, worsening their socio-economic conditions and limiting opportunities for growth and development (Table 2).
Communal land conflicts and land access for physical development in Enugu
The findings of this study revealed that government land acquisitions significantly contribute to communal land conflicts in Enugu. Corrupt government officials and politicians were often identified to collaborate with certain natives to exploit compulsory acquisition powers under land laws to unjustly appropriate neighbouring lands. This abuse of state power frequently triggers resistance from rightful landowners who fight to protect their ancestral lands which hold profound significance as sources of identity and livelihood. The study highlighted that communal land conflicts have persisted in urban peripheral communities for over six decades, particularly in cases where government interventions have been inadequate or biased. Notable examples include: Ogui Nike-Iji Nike vs. Amechi-Ugwuaji Awkunanaw Boundary Conflict: Ongoing since 1942, this conflict has seen several government acquisitions for residential developments, such as the Independence Layout and Premier Layout, yet remains unresolved despite attempts at intervention in 1941, 1944, 1948 and 1954. The core of this dispute lies in competing historical land claims between the indigenous Nike and Awkunanaw communities and is exacerbated by government expropriations under colonial and post-colonial administrations. Despite successive mediation efforts, including court rulings and boundary demarcations, tensions persist because of overlapping customary land tenure systems and allegations of unfair compensation for seized lands.
Additionally, there is the Obeagu Onuayo Akagbe (now Obeagu Awkunanaw) vs. Umu-Edenwoko Akpugo Boundary Dispute: This conflict, dating back to 1941, persists to this day despite multiple court judgments and government actions. The dispute is deeply rooted in historical grievances over territorial boundaries, which have been exacerbated by shifting administrative decisions and inconsistent land policies. The introduction of formal land administration structures under the Land Use Act of 1978 did little to resolve the issue, as local communities continued to rely on customary tenure systems that often contradict statutory regulations. Furthermore, contested land acquisitions for infrastructure projects and real estate developments have fuelled further disputes, with affected communities resisting displacement and demanding greater transparency in government-led land allocations.
Participants repeatedly identified government actions, particularly compulsory land acquisitions and interference, as a significant source of communal land conflicts. These acquisitions often disregard the historical and cultural significance of the land to the communities, as well as the established rights and dynamics within those communities. Respondents highlighted how the government's approach, driven by urbanisation or infrastructural projects, fails to adequately consider the socio-economic implications for the affected populations. One community leader elaborated on this issue:
'The government says they need the land for development, but what about us? They don't think about the families who depend on this land for farming, for identity, for survival. They just come with their machines and destroy everything, leaving us with nothing.' (P7, Male, 58 years old)
The study found that such interference often leads to disputes between communities as they contest boundaries or resist what they perceive as unjust expropriations. In many cases, the lack of transparency in land acquisition processes fosters suspicion and conflict among community members. A participant who was a farmer recounted:
'When they (the government officials) take our land, they don't even consult us properly. They just work with a few people who claim to represent the community, but those people are only concerned about themselves. This causes fights among us because everyone feels cheated.' (P16, Female, 50 years old)
Furthermore, the use of the Land Use Act's compulsory acquisition clause was criticised by participants, who viewed it as a tool for exploitation. One participant keenly expressed:
'The Land Use Act is supposed to protect us, but instead, it is used against us. They manipulate the law to take what they want, and the rest of us are left to fight for scraps. This is why we see conflicts everywhere.' (P39, Female, 38 years old)
The findings suggest that government-induced interference not only disrupts the delicate balance within communities but also undermines trust in public institutions. This lack of trust fuels resistance and prolonged disputes, as affected populations struggle to assert their rights. Participants called for more inclusive and transparent approaches to land acquisition, while at the same time emphasising the importance of respecting community dynamics and ensuring fair compensation for displaced families.
Table 3 of the study provides detailed insights into these dynamics, illustrating how land conflicts perpetuate inequality and undermine inclusive physical development in Enugu. This evidence underscores the urgent need for transparent, equitable and community-centred land administration reforms to mitigate these challenges and ensure sustainable development.
Social inclusion and the church's collaboration in land access for physical development in Enugu
The study identified the Church as a key growth factor in Enugu, a sentiment affirmed by the majority of the participants, including sampled communities and government officials. Respondents highlighted the Church's pivotal role in transforming the Enugu Ngwo coal mining settlement into a thriving city through the establishment of schools, health facilities, water schemes, roads, cemeteries, housing projects and industries that promoted the welfare of the populace. A community leader noted: 'The Church was more than a place of worship; it became the backbone of our society by building schools and hospitals where the government had failed' (P25, Male, 52 years old). The Church's contributions to society can be classified into three dimensions: (1) political dimension, (2) socio-economic dimensions and (3) ecclesiological dimensions. These collaborative roles were also found to be traditionally and institutionally structured and enshrined in the canonical laws of the Church. These roles are further examined accordingly in this research.
The political dimension
The study revealed that the Church maintains a critical but non-partisan political role. According to one government official:
'The Church doesn't meddle in politics, but it provides a moral compass and services that the government often struggles to offer.' (P1, Male, 60 years old)
Participants emphasised the Church's alignment with its social teachings, such as those in Rerum Novarum and Gaudium et Spes, which encourage governance that upholds social justice. These teachings provide a framework for engaging with the political system while remaining apolitical. As one respondent put it:
'[T]he Church acts as the voice of the voiceless, representing the poor in ways that the political system often overlooks.' (P20, Female, 35 years old)
The socio-economic dimension
The study identified that the Church has always associated itself with the socio-economic well-being of the society in accordance with the social teachings as stipulated in the encyclicals of the Popes, especially in Rerum Novarum, Dignitatis Humanae, Gaudium et Spes of Vatican 11 and in the encyclical Mater et Magistra. Some participants repeatedly referenced the Church's role in fostering socio-economic welfare. A clergyman who works in the Ministry of Health stated that:
'[T]he hospitals run by the Church are the only places where the poor can receive care without being turned away for lack of funds.' (P23, Male, 44 years old)
The Church's initiatives are perceived to be guided by its social teachings which advocate for economic justice and equitable resource distribution. A respondent from the education sector observed that 'the Church's schools have not only provided education but also instilled discipline and hope in many families struggling to escape poverty'. The capability of the Church to provide the basic needs and welfare, schools, hospitals and social centres among other institutions, is seen as a strong indication of its intention and ability to help the poor. Some of the institutions established by the Church in Enugu for the welfare of the society are shown in Table 4 to Table 7.
The ecclesiological dimension
The ecclesiological dimension reflects the Church's commitment to social ministry, which integrates faith with practical engagement in societal challenges. One participant remarked that:
'[T]he mission of the church is not only to preach the gospel but to live it by ensuring justice, inclusion, and care for the vulnerable.' (P10, Female, 46 years old)
The social teachings of the Church, as documented in Lumen Gentium and Gaudium et Spes, form the foundation for this ministry. A participant from the clergy explained that:
'[T]he Church's social ministry shapes its institutions and ensures they address the most pressing needs of the people, particularly in underserved communities.' (P2, Male, 52 years old)
This section highlights the significant implications of the Church's collaborative efforts in promoting social inclusion and facilitating land access for physical development in Enugu. The Church's multi-dimensional contributions to Enugu's development demonstrate how faith-based organisations can fill governance gaps, reduce inequalities and foster inclusive growth. Through the integration of political, socio-economic and ecclesiological dimensions, the Church has not only transformed communities but also established a sustainable framework for development that prioritises justice, equity and human dignity.
Discussion
The findings indicate that Enugu functions with a dual land administration system, merging formal regulations such as the Land Use Act of 1978 and informal practices based on community traditions. This duality leads to inefficiencies and encourages corruption, reflecting earlier research (e.g. Hendrickse 2024; Uyi & Tifwa 2024) that emphasises the difficulties of hybrid governance in urban African contexts. The presence of these systems hinders planning and leads to disjointed urban growth, especially in peri-urban regions. Policy changes should focus on aligning these frameworks, clarifying responsibilities and minimising chances for misconduct. The research also shows that Enugu's urban development is hindered by an obsolete master plan (1979) and insufficient documentation. These results agree with Rigon et al. (2018) who claim that numerous African cities do not have the ability for contemporary urban planning. The consequences involve disordered land use practices and the exclusion of at-risk populations, especially women and the impoverished in urban areas. Tackling these problems necessitates funding for the digitalisation of land records and the revision of master plans to align with present conditions.
Furthermore, the findings reveal systemic land grabbing facilitated by compulsory acquisition laws, often benefiting government entities and native elites. This exacerbates landlessness among the urban poor, a phenomenon widely documented in African urban studies (e.g. Notess et al. 2021). Such practices not only displace communities but also erode trust in public institutions. Advocacy for more transparent land acquisition processes, fair compensation mechanisms and participatory governance is crucial. In the same way, it was found that weak enforcement of planning regulations has led to the proliferation of informal settlements characterised by inadequate infrastructure and services. These findings resonate with UN-Habitat (2023) reports on the growth of slums in sub-Saharan Africa. Informal settlements pose significant challenges, including poor sanitation, health risks and social exclusion. Addressing this requires a multi-pronged approach that combines upgrading existing settlements with proactive measures to prevent future slum formation.
Additionally, the research reveals persistent local land disputes like the Ogui Nike and Amechi-Ugwuaji border conflicts. These conflicts are frequently intensified by government purchases and unclear procedures. This discovery corresponds with research by Koroso, Zevenbergen and Lengoiboni (2019), which associates land conflicts with inadequate institutional structures. Addressing these conflicts requires enhancing dispute resolution systems and encouraging transparency in land dealings. Simultaneously, the results indicate the marginalisation of disadvantaged groups caused by rising land costs, inadequate compensation methods and preferential treatment in land distribution. This reflects patterns seen in various African cities (Anas & Musah 2023), where unequal land access exacerbates socio-economic inequalities. Policy actions must focus on fair land allocation and specific assistance for disadvantaged communities.
The results of the study highlight the important initiatives and socio-economic actions carried out by the church. These initiatives demonstrate the church's longstanding dedication to social welfare, justice and community growth. Regarding pro-poor advocacy, the church has become a prominent supporter of fair resource allocation. Results from this research indicate that the church establishes skill development, economic empowerment and social welfare initiatives aimed at marginalised or disadvantaged populations. These efforts not only decrease poverty but also alleviate resource-driven conflicts. This concurs with Sele and Wanjiku's (2024) claim that churches bear a moral responsibility to confront structural inequities, especially in situations where economic imbalances drive social upheaval.
Theological reflections and the church's role in land conflict resolution
Theological foundations for land justice and social cohesion
Land, seen as a sacred blessing, carries deep theological importance in various religious traditions, especially in Christianity, where it is regarded as a resource given to humans for careful management and fair allocation (Gn 1:28; Lv 25:23). The idea of justice in land management corresponds with Catholic social teachings, especially the principles of the universal destination of goods and a preferential option for the poor (Gaudium et Spes 1965; Rerum Novarum 1891). These principles stress that land and resources ought not to be controlled by the powerful to the detriment of the marginalised and that social systems must guarantee equitable access for everyone, particularly the impoverished and disenfranchised. The Church's engagement in resolving land disputes and fostering social harmony must hence be grounded in theological principles of justice, reconciliation and peacebuilding (Mt 5:9). In addition to its current roles in education, healthcare and advocacy, the Church needs to purposefully incorporate these theological principles into its practical efforts to resolve community land disputes.
Practical strategies for church-government collaboration
To move beyond merely stating the Church's current role, this study proposes specific, actionable strategies through which the Church can enhance its impact on land conflict resolution and social inclusion in partnership with government authorities. These four strategies are enunciated as:
1. Mediation and faith-based conflict resolution
The Church can serve as a neutral mediator in communal land disputes, drawing on its moral authority and community trust.
It can establish Interfaith Conflict Mediation Centres, where religious leaders facilitate reconciliatory dialogue between disputing parties.
Drawing from scriptural principles of peace and reconciliation (2 Cor 5:18-19), the Church can implement biblical-based mediation models that emphasise restorative justice.
2. Advocacy for just and inclusive land policies
The Church should leverage its institutional influence to advocate for transparent land governance and policies that protect the urban poor from unjust displacement.
Religious leaders can collaborate with policymakers to promote land reforms that integrate informal land access mechanisms into formal governance structures.
The Catholic Bishops' Conference and other faith-based networks can lobby for fair compensation mechanisms for displaced persons, ensuring their rights are protected under the law.
3. Community education on land rights and ethical stewardship
The Church should establish land justice education programmes, teaching marginalised communities about their legal rights and ethical land stewardship.
Church-run schools and institutions can incorporate land ethics and social justice curricula, equipping young people with knowledge about equitable land governance.
The Church can use sermons, workshops and social media campaigns to educate congregants on land rights from a theological perspective, fostering a justice-oriented mindset.
4. Development of affordable housing and alternative land access
The Church can partner with the government and Non-governmental organisations to develop low-cost housing schemes for displaced or landless families.
Church-owned lands could be allocated for community-led housing projects, promoting cooperative land ownership models that ensure sustainable access.
Faith-based microfinance initiatives can provide financial support for pro-poor land acquisition, reducing barriers to land ownership for marginalised groups.
Conclusion and recommendations
This study has highlighted the complexities and inefficiencies in Enugu's land administration and tenure systems, which operate under a dual framework of formal laws and informal practices. These systems, while designed to support equitable land distribution and urban development, have inadvertently perpetuated systemic exclusions, unplanned growth and socio-economic disparities. Communal land conflicts, driven by government land acquisitions, exploitation of compulsory acquisition laws and marginalisation of vulnerable groups, have further exacerbated these challenges. The findings underscore the critical role of the Church in addressing these issues. Through its socio-economic initiatives, advocacy for justice and grassroots engagement, the Church has demonstrated its capacity to contribute meaningfully to resolving communal land conflicts and promoting pro-poor policies. Integrating the Church's efforts into formal land governance frameworks presents a unique opportunity to foster social inclusion, mitigate conflicts and ensure equitable development. A multi-stakeholder approach that prioritises transparency, inclusivity and justice is needed to address the issues identified in this study. Through the strengthening of institutional frameworks, bridging formal and informal systems and leveraging the Church's resources and moral authority, Enugu can develop sustainable solutions to its land administration challenges.
This study therefore recommends Government, Community, Church collaboration towards addressing the social exclusion of the poor in land access and physical development as well as the communal land conflict in the city. This collaboration should also foster the integration of the prevailing informal into the formal land administration and be tailored to minimise the cost of land and increase the accessibility of urban land to the poor while eliminating double charging and the inherent bureaucratic bottlenecks. Additionally, policies should be developed to integrate informal land access systems, such as inheritance and community allotments into formal frameworks. This can enhance transparency and reduce conflicts while preserving the social benefits of communal practices. Proper resettlement and just compensation schemes should be packaged and delivered directly to persons affected by displacements or evictions in the area. Updating and adopting the 1979 urban Master plan of Enugu, land Cadastral and proper record keeping would facilitate easy access to land for all and help in present and future land use planning and developments in the city. These will also help address the issue of slums and squatter settlements while engendering inclusive pro-poor land access and physical development. Urban renewal schemes should be carried out in the peripheral communities so as to revitalise and provide infrastructural facilities and amenities in the areas. The Government, Community, Church collaborative measures in land administration will ensure pro-poor social inclusion and sustainable development in communities as the Church is an identified growth factor in the area.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Dr MacPerson Nnam for his guiding support during the article preparation.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.
Authors' contributions
All authors C.M.A., C.O.O., E.E.O., C.D.O. and B.O.A. contributed to proofreading and approving the manuscript. C.M.A. and C.O.O. worked on conceptualising and writing the introduction section, while C.O.O. also contributed to the conclusion. E.E.O. focussed on writing the literature review and introduction sections, and C.D.O. contributed to the methodology, results and conclusion sections. B.O.A. worked on the introduction, literature review and conclusion sections.
Funding information
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. It does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article's results, findings and content.
References
Adedeji, I., 2023, 'Nigerian urbanization and the significance of affordable housing', Journal of Service Science and Management 16(3), 351-368. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2023.163020 [ Links ]
Adekola, O., Krigsholm, P. & Riekkinen, K., 2023, 'Adapted institutional analysis and development framework for understanding customary land institutions in sub-Saharan Africa - A case study from Nigeria', Land Use Policy 131, 106691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106691 [ Links ]
Aguilar, A.G., Flores, M.A. & Lara, L.F., 2022, 'Peri-urbanization and land use fragmentation in Mexico City: Informality, environmental deterioration, and ineffective urban policy', Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 4, 790474. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.790474 [ Links ]
Agyabeng, A.N., Peprah, A.A., Mensah, J.K. & Mensah, E.A., 2022, 'Informal settlement and urban development discourse in the Global South: Evidence from Ghana', Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography 76(4), 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2022.2113428 [ Links ]
Ahmed, H.U., 2024, 'Northern Nigerian women in and beyond the Boko Haram conflict: Complexities of media, communications, and gendered agency', Doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science, Maiduguri. [ Links ]
Anas, A.L. & Musah, A., 2023, 'Deepening inequalities in sub-Saharan Africa amidst the Covid-19 crisis: Education and labor market spaces in perspective', Human Arenas 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-023-00343-9 [ Links ]
Anierobi, C.M. & Obasi, C.O., 2021, 'Urbanization and rural-urban migration: Toward involving the church in addressing pro-poor urban housing challenges in Enugu, Nigeria', SAGE Open 11(3), 21582440211. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040123 [ Links ]
Anierobi, C.M., Obasi, C.O., Nnamani, R.G., Ajah, B.O., Iloma, D.O., Efobi, K.O. et al., 2024, 'Communal conflicts in Nigeria: Assessment of the impacts on internally displaced persons and settlements amidst COVID-19 pandemic', Heliyon 10(9), e30200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30200 [ Links ]
Ankeli, I.A., 2023, 'Influence of land use conversions on property rental values in South West, Nigeria', Doctoral dissertation, University of Lagos, Lagos. [ Links ]
Bhanye, J., Matamanda, A.R., Kohima, J. & Bandauko, E., 2024, 'Implications of peri-urban land reform programs on urban land markets: A case study of Harare, Zimbabwe', Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11, 1040. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03500-9 [ Links ]
Brandful, C.P. & Nsomah, A.H., 2017, 'A Ghanaian twist to urban sprawl', Land Use Policy 61, 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.047 [ Links ]
Catholic Diocese of Enugu, 2018, Diocesan directory and liturgical calendar, ed. A.C. Agu (ed.), The Diocesan Catholic Secretariat, Enugu. [ Links ]
Davis, J., Pijawka, K.D., Wentz, E., Hale, M. & King, D.A., 2021, 'Evaluating geodesign for community-based tribal planning: The role of planners in marginalized communities', Journal of the American Planning Association 87(4), 527-541. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2021.1873168 [ Links ]
Eze, J., 2021, 'Urbanization in Nigeria, Enugu (the coal city) as an urban town: A historical review', Cities 113, 1-10, 103096. [ Links ]
Gaudium et Spes, 1965, Pastoral constitution on the church in the modern world, viewed n.d., from https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.html. [ Links ]
Gonçalves, V.N., Ponchio, M.C. & Basílio, R.G., 2021, 'Women's financial well-being: A systematic literature review and directions for future research', International Journal of Consumer Studies 45(4), 824-843. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12673 [ Links ]
Haque, M.N. & Sharifi, A., 2024, 'Who are marginalized in accessing urban ecosystem services? A systematic literature review', Land Use Policy 144, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107266 [ Links ]
Hendrickse, R., 2024, 'Hybrid governance in selected African countries: A conceptual debate and literature review', International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy 6(4), 361-372. https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v6i4.584 [ Links ]
Koroso, N.H., Zevenbergen, J.A. & Lengoiboni, M., 2019, 'Land institutions' credibility: Analyzing the role of complementary institutions', Land Use Policy 81, 553-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.026 [ Links ]
Lawanson, T., 2020, 'Lagos' size and slums will make stopping the spread of COVID-19 a tough task', The Conversation Online Journal 1, 5. [ Links ]
Mrutu, P., 2023, 'Examining the role of religious institutions in peacebuilding and conflict management in Tanzania', Doctoral dissertation, IAA, Arusha. [ Links ]
National Population Commission, 1991, Official Gazette. [ Links ]
Nchor, J.U., 2022, 'Housing problems and vulnerability in Nigeria's informal settlements', Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University, Calabar. [ Links ]
Notess, L., Veit, P., Monterroso, I., Andiko, E., Sulle, E., Larson, A.M. et al., 2021, 'Community land formalization and company land acquisition procedures: A review of 33 procedures in 15 countries', Land Use Policy 110, 104461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104461 [ Links ]
Ntumva, M.E., 2022, 'Farmer-pastoralist conflicts management approaches in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights into their strengths and pitfalls', Journal of African Studies and Development 14(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.5897/JASD2021.0650 [ Links ]
Nuhu, S., 2021, Rethinking land access governance in Global South cities: Understanding the dynamics and contentions of land access processes and governance mechanisms in peri-urban areas of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, (No. 2021: 27), Dar es Salaam, https://publications.slu.se/?file=jour/show&cid=17229288&lang=en"Acta_Universitatis_Agriculturae_Sueciae. [ Links ]
Nuhu, S. & Mpambije, C.J., 2017, 'Land access and corruption practices in the peri-urban areas of Tanzania: A review of democratic governance theory', Open Journal of Social Sciences 5(4), 282-299. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.54025 [ Links ]
Ogara, P.I., 2024, 'Rethinking education for religious harmony in Nigeria', Oracle of Wisdom Journal of Philosophy and Public Affairs 8(1), 57-69. [ Links ]
Rerum Novarum, 1891, Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII on capital and labor, viewed n.d., from https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_15051891_rerum-novarum.html. [ Links ]
Rigon, A., 2022, 'Diversity, justice and slum upgrading: An intersectional approach to urban development', Habitat International 130, 102691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102691 [ Links ]
Rigon, A., Macarthy, J.M., Koroma, B. & Frediani, A.A., 2018, 'The politics of urban management and planning in African cities', in T. Binns, K. Lynch & E. Nel (eds.), Handbook of African development, pp. 415-425, Routledge, New York, NY. [ Links ]
Rodima-Taylor, D., 2021, 'Digitalizing land administration: The geographies and temporalities of infrastructural promise', Geoforum 122, 140-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.04.003 [ Links ]
Sele, J.P. & Wanjiku, C., 2024, 'Theology of development: Addressing poverty and inequality in Nigeria and Kenya', Greener Journal of Social Sciences 14(2), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjss.2024.2.093024123 [ Links ]
Supraptiningsih, U., Jubba, H., Hariyanto, E. & Rahmawati, T., 2023, 'Inequality as a cultural construction: Women's access to land rights in Madurese society', Cogent Social Sciences 9(1), 2194733. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2194733 [ Links ]
Uchegbu, S.N. & Anierobi, C.M., 2014, 'Urban land use planning and administration in Nigeria: A case for land accessibility for poor communities in Enugu, Nigeria', Journal of the Nigerian Institute of Town Planners 1-13. [ Links ]
UN-Habitat Report, 2023, SDG 11: Sustainable cities and make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable communities, United Nations, viewed 11 April 2024, from https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2023/07/2023_hlpf_factsheet_sdg_11_1.pdf. [ Links ]
Uyi, E. & Tifwa, H.Y., 2024, 'The role of inclusionary hybrid governance in housing delivery in Jos: A review', African Journal of Environmental Sciences and Renewable Energy 14(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.62154/e3rtpe05 [ Links ]
Uzuegbunam, A.O. & Nwofia, J.E., 2014, 'Ethno-communal conflict and the local government system in Nigeria: A desideratum of peace building', Journal of Scientific Research and Reports 3(10), 1403-1420. https://doi.org/10.9734/JSRR/2014/9061 [ Links ]
Vatican II, 1963, Lumen gentium, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Vatican City. [ Links ]
Vatican II, 1965a, Dignitatis humanae, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Vatican City. [ Links ]
Vatican II, 1965b, Gaudium et Spes, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Vatican City. [ Links ]
Wubie, A.M., De Vries, W.T. & Alemie, B.K., 2021, 'Synthesizing the dilemmas and prospects for a peri-urban land use management framework: Evidence from Ethiopia', Land Use Policy 100, 105122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105122 [ Links ]
Correspondence:
Chukwuemeka Onyejegbu
onyejegbudominic@gmail.com
Received: 16 Jan. 2025
Accepted: 10 Feb. 2025
Published: 15 May 2025