SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número69Admission of guilt fine: A legal shortcut with delayed shock?Interview with Shaun Shelly, Researcher at the University of Pretoria and the Policy, Advocacy and Human Rights lead at TB HIV Care, South Africa índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
    • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

    Compartilhar


    South African Crime Quarterly

    versão On-line ISSN 2413-3108versão impressa ISSN 1991-3877

    Resumo

    OSMAN, Fatima. The omission of the opt-out clause – The revised (and improved?) Traditional Courts Bill 2017. SA crime q. [online]. 2020, n.69, pp.69-79. ISSN 2413-3108.  https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2020/i69a7821.

    The Traditional Courts Bill B1B-2017 omits the opt-out clause and the notion that engagement with traditional courts is on a voluntary and consensual basis - a long-standing sticky point with traditional leaders. Under the Bill, individuals are bound to attend a traditional court when summoned and cannot opt-out of the system, which conflicts starkly with the notion of customary law as a voluntary and consensual system of law. This article argues that compelling individuals to attend a traditional court may be unconstitutional for unjustifiably infringing the rights to culture, a fair trial and equality.

            · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )