SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.103 número1-2 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
    • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

    Compartilhar


    South African Journal of Science

    versão On-line ISSN 1996-7489versão impressa ISSN 0038-2353

    S. Afr. j. sci. vol.103 no.1-2 Pretoria Jan./Fev. 2007

     

    COMMENTARY

     

    The problematic ratings game in modern science

     

     

    Michael Berger

     

     

    “Full text available only in PDF format”

     

     

    1. Gross P.L.K. and Gross E.M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science 66, 385-389, quoted in The ISI Impact Factor. Online: http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/journalcitationreports/impactfactors/        [ Links ]

    2. Garfield E. (1955). Citation indices for science: a new dimension for documentation through association of ideas. Science 122, 108-111.         [ Links ]

    3. Garfield E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178, 471-79.         [ Links ]

    4. Garfield E. (1986). Which medical journals have the greatest impact? Ann. Int. Med. 105, 313-320.         [ Links ]

    5. Online: http://scientific.thomson.com/products/jcr/        [ Links ]

    6. Online: http://scientific.thomson.com/products/        [ Links ]

    7. Wikipedia, Impact Factor. Online: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_Factor        [ Links ]

    8. Monastersky R. (2005). The number that's devouring science. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Online: http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i08/08a01201.htm        [ Links ]

    9. Hirsch J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16569-16572.         [ Links ]

    10. Dong P., Loh M. and Mandry A. (2005). The "impact factor" revisited. Biomedical Digital Libraries. Online: http://www.bio-diglib.com/content/2/1/7        [ Links ]

    11. Perkel J.M. (2005). The future of citation analysis: the challenge is to track a work's impact when published in nontraditional forms. The Scientist. Online: http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/futureofcitationanalysists102405.pdf        [ Links ]

    12. Pouris A. ((2004). Evaluating the impact and visibility of the South African Journal of Science. S. Afr. J. Sci. 100, 515-517.         [ Links ]

    13. ScienceWatch (2005). Hottest journals of the millennium (so far). Online: http://www.sciencewatch.com/jan-feb2005/swjan-feb2005_page1.htm        [ Links ]

    14. Academy of Science of South Africa (2006). A Strategic Approach to Research Publishingin South Africa. Online: http://www.assaf.co.za/reports/        [ Links ]