SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.65 número1 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


South African Family Practice

versión On-line ISSN 2078-6204
versión impresa ISSN 2078-6190

Resumen

PREMSAGAR, Preesha; ALDOUS, Colleen  y  ESTERHUIZEN, Tonya. Cardiac scoring systems, coronary artery disease and major adverse cardiovascular events: A scoping review. SAFP [online]. 2023, vol.65, n.1, pp.1-8. ISSN 2078-6204.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v65i1.5683.

BACKGROUND: In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared coronary artery disease (CAD) as the leading cause of death globally for the last 20 years. Early screening and detection (primary prevention) and intervention (secondary prevention) are necessary to curb CAD and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) prevalence. A scoping review to assess the current literature on using cardiac scoring systems to predict CAD and MACE was performed METHODS: The research question 'What is the literature on using cardiac scoring systems to predict CAD and MACE?' was addressed. The updated Arksey and O'Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews methodologies were used. The search terms 'coronary artery disease' and 'cardiac scoring systems' and 'major adverse cardiovascular events' were used in the Boolean search on PubMed, ScienceDirect, MedLine and Cochrane Library RESULTS: The final list consisted of 19 published English results after the year 2000. There were six results without participants (four clinical guidelines, one review article and one ongoing clinical trial). Scoring systems were cardiovascular risk estimation systems focusing on the primary prevention of CAD; MACE was discussed but not scored. There were 13 robust results published from completed multinational clinical trials with participants. These results focused on a scoring system for the secondary prevention of CAD and MACE CONCLUSION: Scoring systems remain an objective method for primary and secondary prevention of CAD and MACE CONTRIBUTION: Scoring systems may be helpful with clinical uncertainty or to standardise patient results for comparison in research

Palabras clave : scoping review; coronary artery disease CAD; cardiac scoring systems; major adverse cardiovascular events MACE.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons