SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número65 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Compartir


    South African Crime Quarterly

    versión On-line ISSN 2413-3108versión impresa ISSN 1991-3877

    Resumen

    NANIMA, Robert Doya. A missing link in the Traditional Courts Bill 2017. Evidence obtained through human rights violations. SA crime q. [online]. 2018, n.65, pp.23-31. ISSN 2413-3108.  https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2018/i65a5268.

    The issue of admission of evidence obtained through human rights violations is central to a criminal justice system as a mechanism through which to prevent overzealous prosecution by the state and ensure protection of human rights. As such, any court that deals with criminal cases has to evaluate evidence before it is admitted. This article argues that the Traditional Courts Bill (TCB)1 does not provide for a mode of dealing with evidence obtained as a result of human rights violations. To substantiate this argument, the article reviews the current Bill, and reflects on the challenges that arise with regard to evidence obtained in this way. The article contextualises section 35(5) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, and discusses the practical difficulties of applying it under the current Bill. The article concludes with recommendations for measures that can ensure that accused persons are not prejudiced when appearing before the court.

            · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )